IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
J.M.KHAZI, J
Narayanrao, Son Of Sri Narasingrao Tirmal – Appellant
Versus
Alkavatibai, Wife Of Late Vedvrat Tirmal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.M.KHAZI, J.
This is defendant's second appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court dismissing the regular appeal filed by him and allowing the Regular Appeal filed by the plaintiff, challenging the judgment and decree of the trial Court, partly decreeing the suit of plaintiff, ordering refund of earnest money of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest at 6% per annum, though her suit for specific performance came to be dismissed. By allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff, the First Appellate Court has decreed the suit in entirety and ordered for specific performance of contract.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to by their ranks before the trial Court.
3. Plaintiff is no other than sister-in-law of defendant i.e, the late husband of plaintiff and defendant are real brothers. Defendant is the absolute owner of suit schedule property consisting of a shop premises measuring 6×18 ft, situated in the ground floor. The adjoining shop premises of same dimension situated on the western side of suit property belongs to the plaintiff. Plaintiff filed suit for specific performance of contract dated 26.06.2008 for sale of suit schedule pr
Narne Rama Murthy Vs. Ravula Somasundaram and Ors.
Gurudev Kaur and Ors. Vs. Kaki and Ors. (Gurudev Kaur)
Narinderjit Singh Vs. North Star Estate Promoters Ltd. (Narinderjit Singh)
In specific performance cases, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish contract terms and signatures' validity, contradicting the lower courts' misplacement of this burden onto the d....
In a suit for specific performance, the Plaintiff must prove the genuineness of the agreement and his readiness to perform, failing which the suit must be dismissed.
Specific performance requires plaintiffs to prove the agreement and readiness to fulfill the contract, assessed through both documentary and oral evidence.
The court affirmed that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, requiring the plaintiff to prove the validity of the contract and readiness to perform.
The court upheld that corroborated expert evidence can establish the authenticity of a contested agreement, supporting the plaintiff's claim for specific performance.
The judgment establishes that specific performance can be granted when the plaintiff proves the execution of the contract and demonstrates readiness and willingness to perform, despite the defendant'....
The court affirmed that specific performance can be granted when the execution of the sale agreement is proven and the plaintiff demonstrates readiness and willingness to perform their contractual ob....
To establish a claim for specific performance, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the authenticity of the contract, which was found lacking in this case.
Agreement to sell – Suit seeking relief of specific performance cannot be allowed where Plaintiff fails to prove that agreement was intended to sell the property and was not executed as a security fo....
Expert evidence should not displace substantive evidence in evaluating contractual disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.