IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
V. Udayakumar – Appellant
Versus
C. Dhuraisamy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 15.04.2013 made in A.S.No.81 of 2012 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Erode reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 24.02.2012 passed in O.S. No. 215 of 2009 on the file of the learned II Additional Sub Judge, Erode.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this Appeal are referred to as per their status before the trial Court, the learned II Additional Sub Judge, Erode as “Plaintiff” and “Defendants” throughout the discussion hereafterwards.
3. The first Defendant in O.S. No. 215 of 2019 on the file of the learned II Additional Sub Judge, Erode is the Appellant in this Second Appeal. The suit in O.S. No. 215 of 2019 was filed by the first Respondent, as Plaintiff, for the relief of specific performance of the agreement dated 24.10.2007.
4. As per the plaint averments, the first Defendant/Appellant was the owner of the suit scheduled property. On 24.10.2007, an agreement of sale was entered into between the Plaintiff and first Defendant. As per the agreement of sale dated 24.10.2007, the sale consideration was fixed at Rs.4,00,000/- out of which a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- w

In a suit for specific performance, the Plaintiff must prove the genuineness of the agreement and his readiness to perform, failing which the suit must be dismissed.
The judgment establishes that specific performance can be granted when the plaintiff proves the execution of the contract and demonstrates readiness and willingness to perform, despite the defendant'....
The court affirmed that specific performance can be granted when the execution of the sale agreement is proven and the plaintiff demonstrates readiness and willingness to perform their contractual ob....
The court affirmed that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, requiring the plaintiff to prove the validity of the contract and readiness to perform.
An agreement of sale signed by vendor alone and delivered to purchaser, and accepted by the purchaser, has always been considered to be a valid contract. In the event of breach by the vendor, it can ....
The plaintiff's failure to prove willingness to perform the contract led to the grant of the alternate relief of refund of the advance money.
Point of law: Unless a statute specifically requires a plea to be in any particular form, it can be in any form. No specific phraseology or language is required to take such a plea. The language in S....
The court ruled that a Sale Agreement was not effectively revoked, and the plaintiff was always ready to perform, necessitating specific performance.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a party seeking specific performance to prove the execution of the sale agreement and demonstrate readiness and willingness ....
The plaintiff's failure to prove the execution of the sale agreement and her readiness and willingness for specific performance, along with the defendant's established possession and enjoyment of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.