Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S. KINAGI
Channappa S/o Late Kalegowda – Appellant
Versus
Rangegowda S/o Late Kalegowda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK S. KINAGI, J.
1. The appellants and respondents are present before the court. They are identified by their respective counsels.
2. The appellants and respondents filed a compromise petition, which reads as under:
“MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE PETITION UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 READ WITH SECTION 151 CPC
The parties begs to submit as under:
1. One Boose Kalegowda had 2 wives namely Smt. Doddamma and Smt. Kalamma. Through Doddamma, Boose Kalegowda had 4 children namely Channappa, Nanjappa, Akkamma and Ammayamma. Through Kalamma said Boose Kalegowda had 3 sons namely Rangegowda, Nanjappa and Kalegowda. The legal representatives of Channappa S/O of Boose kalegowda & Doddamma are the appellants in RSA.No.1722/2017 and 1723/2017.
2. Second son of Boose Kalegowda & Doddamma namely Nanjappa is no more. His widow Smt. Singamma is the appellant in RSA.No.1245/2021.
3. Akkamma, the daughter of Boose Kalegowda & Doddamma is no more and she died issueless.
4. Ammayamma, the daughter of Boose Kalegowda & Doddamma is no more. She had a son by name Manjegowda. Manjegowda is no more. Wife of Manjegowda namely Nagamma and son of Manjegowda namely Nagaraju C.M are the appellants in RSA.No.358/2022.
Settlement of property disputes via compromise is valid under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, affirming the parties' mutual consent and withdrawal of appeals.
The court upheld the voluntary compromise between parties regarding partition claims and confirmed the modification of the decree, emphasizing the absence of coercion and mutual satisfaction with the....
A compromise between parties, if accepted by the court, is binding and results in the cessation of claims while outlining property rights and financial settlements.
The court validates a compromise petition concerning family property, affirming the agreement's binding nature on all parties involved, which leads to the final decree.
The court endorsed that compromises among parties are valid if conducted lawfully, supporting conflict resolution without legal impediments.
When they are not shown to be in any manner perverse, illogical and irrational, resultantly, the substantial questions of law formulated are accordingly answered infavour of the plaintiff and against....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
