Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ASHOK S.KINAGI
Dilshad, D/o Abdul Khader – Appellant
Versus
Najamunnisa W/o Late Abdul Azeez – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties and power-of-attorney (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the original suits and appeals (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. validity of wills and their legal implications (Para 5) |
| 4. settlement and compromise terms (Para 6) |
| 5. judicial approval of the compromise (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK S.KINAGI, J.
Appellant No.5(b) and power-of-attorney holder of appellant Nos.5(a) and 5(c) to 5(g) are present and respondent No.2 and power-of-attorney holder of respondent Nos.3 to 5 are present, and they are identified by their respective counsel.
2. Appellant No.5(b) filed the general power-of- attorney, which discloses that appellant Nos.5(a), 5(c) to (g) executed a power-of-attorney in favour of appellant No.5(b) to enter into compromise. Similarly, respondent No.2 produced the general power-of-attorney executed by respondent Nos.3 to 5, which discloses that they have authorized respondent No.2 to enter into compromise.
3. Pursuant to the general power-of-attorneys executed by respondent Nos.5(a) and 5(c) to (g) and respondent Nos.3 to 5, appellant No.5(a) and respondent No.2 have jointly filed a memorandum of compromise petition, which reads as follows:
“1. The Plaintiffs in O.S. No.
The court endorsed that compromises among parties are valid if conducted lawfully, supporting conflict resolution without legal impediments.
Court recognized a mutual settlement among parties and recorded a decree reflecting the terms agreed upon during the appeal.
The court validates a compromise petition concerning family property, affirming the agreement's binding nature on all parties involved, which leads to the final decree.
Parties may settle disputes amicably through a lawful compromise, which is accepted by the court.
When they are not shown to be in any manner perverse, illogical and irrational, resultantly, the substantial questions of law formulated are accordingly answered infavour of the plaintiff and against....
(1) Daughter has been recognised and treated as a coparcener by birth with equal rights and liabilities as of that of a son – It is not necessary that a coparcener whose daughter is conferred with ri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the voluntary agreement of the parties through the compromise petition, which influenced the court's decision and resulted in the modification of t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
