SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 851

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
V. KAMESWAR RAO, T.M. NADAF, JJ.
S. Nagaraja - Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Finance Corporation - Respondent
Commercial Appeal No. 118 of 2021
Decided On : 02-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : S. Nagaraja, B.M. Prathib [Parties-In-Person]
For the Respondent: P.S. Malipatil

Guarantors remain jointly and severally liable for loan defaults regardless of the principal debtor's separate legal status, as established under Sections 29 and 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951.

Headnote:(A) State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 30, 31, 32 - Recovery of loan dues - Corporation sought recovery of Rs.1,63,28,999/- with interest from guarantors for loan default by respondent company - Trial court held corporation established default and awarded relief. (Paras 2, 18, 20)

(B) Guarantee Liability - Guarantors are jointly and severally liable for debts of principal debtor, even if the principal debtor is a separate legal entity. (Paras 68, 34)

Facts of the case:
Respondent company defaulted on loan of Rs.45 lakhs sanctioned by petitioner corporation, leading to recovery actions against the guarantors, who denied liability despite executing guarantees. (Paras 1, 5, 10, 11)

Findings of Court:
The trial court confirmed the liability of the guarantors as established by exhibited documents, ruling that they could not escape financial obligations. (Paras 20, 68)

Issues: Whether the corporation proved the due amount and whether the trial court's decision on liability was appropriate. (Para 27)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the binding nature of guarantees and upheld the responsibility of guarantors in loan defaults irrespective of the timing of payments or actions taken by the corporation. (Paras 68, 30)

Result: Appeal dismissed as devoid of merit.

Table of Content
1. appeal against trial court judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background of financial transactions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. details of guarantors' liabilities. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. arguments from both parties. (Para 18 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. trial court's determination of debt and interest. (Para 20)
6. court's decision based on interpretation. (Para 21 , 37)
7. arguments presented by the appellants and the response by the corporation. (Para 25)
8. court's critical observations. (Para 26 , 28 , 29 , 30)
9. application of relevant legal provisions. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
10. final order and dismissal of appeal. (Para 38)

JUDGMENT :

T.M. NADAF, J.

1. This appeal is by appellants/respondent nos.2 and 4 before the trial court, calling in question the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2021, in COM.MISC NO.279/2004, passed by the LXXXIII Additional City Civil And Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, only against the appellants herein (respondents Nos.2 and 4) and also to allow the counter claim of appellant No.1.

2. Com.Misc.No.279/2004 registered on the application filed by respondent No.1 - Karnataka State Finance Corporation (‘Corporation’ for short) under Sections-31(1) and 32(2) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (‘SFC Act’ for short) for recovery of Rs.1,63,28,999/- as on 10.12.2003 from respondent No.2, M/s. Vishwaroopa Visions Private Limited, with future interest at 22.5% per annum, compounded at quarterly rests till realisation of the entire amount and to pass orders, to enforce liabilities of the appellants and respondent Nos.3 to 8 as guarantors to pay Rs.1,63,28,999/- due from respondent No.2, as on 10.12.2003 payable with future interest at 21.5% compounded at quarterly rest till the payment of the entire amount; also for confirmation of prohibitory order of injunction in respect of petition Schedule Nos.I, II and III properties and such other relief and cost.

3. The trial court by a judgment and decree dated18.03.2021, allowed the Misc. Application in part along with cost as follows:

“It is declared that the respondent No.1 is due in a sum of Rs.1,63,28,999/- (One Crore Sixty three lakhs twenty eight thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine) (as on 10.12.2003) with future interest @ 22.5% per annum compounded at quarterly rests.

The respondent No.2 to 9 being guarantors are jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.1,63,28,999/-(One Crore Sixty three lakhs twenty eight thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine) (as on 10.12.2003) with future interest @ 21.5% per annum compounded at quarterly rests till the date of realization.

The prayer of Petitioner Corporation with respect to confirmation of order of injunction dated 31.03.2004 is hereby dismissed.

The set off and counter claim made by respondent No.2 is hereby dismissed.

The office is hereby directed to send a copy of the judgment to the petitioner through email as per Order XX Rule 1 CPC as amended by Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.”

4. The parties will be referred to as per their ranking before the trial court for easy reference.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

5. That Karnataka State Financial Corporation is established by the Government of Karnataka for the State of Karnataka u/s 3 of the S.F.C. Act and is carrying on its functions specified in section 25 r/w section 24 of the Act. The Corporation is the only statutory public financial institution established in the State of Karnataka with an object of rendering financial assistance to institutions established in the State of Karnataka and is wholly owned by the State Government. The money advanced and lent to the Industrial concerns are in the nature of public money collected by way of refinance loans from the Industrial Development Bank of India and other Central Public Financial Institutions, in addition to money made available by the State Government and also raised by way of debentures, public deposits. The Corporation has to deal with these funds on business principles, with due regard being had to the interest of indu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top