IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Kamaganahalli Milk Producers Women's Cooperative Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Petitioner in W.P. No. 21521/2024 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
(1) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or order, quashing the order issued by the R2 dated 20.02.2024 in no. JRB/Thiddupadi-2/26/2023-24 produced as Annexure-D.
(2) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or order, quashing the order issued by the R2 dated 03.08.2024 in No. JRB/Thiddupadi- 2/12(5) Nirdeshana/2024-25 produced as Annexure-F.
(3) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the amended/corrigendum order dated 05.08.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 in No. JRB/Thiddupadi-2/12(5) Nirdeshana/2024-25 is herewith produced as Annexure-G.
(4) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.
2. The Petitioner in WP No.22271/2024 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
(1) Issue a writ of certiorari to quash the orders passed by the 2nd Respondent Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Bengaluru region Bengaluru in No. JRB/Tiddupadi-2/26/2023-24 dated 20.02.2024 as per Annexure-J and order dated 03.08.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent in No. JRB/Thiddupadi-2/12(5



















































Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited and others
Ghulam Qadir vs. Special Tribunal and others
Abdulla A.K. vs. Nanjarayapatna Vyavasaya Seva
Daman Singh vs. State of Punjab
State of U.P. vs. COD. Cheokki Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.
Samaja Seva Sahakari Bank Niyamitha vs. The State of Karnataka
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.