IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
Sharada Achar W/o Shri Padmanabha Achar - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 656, 2306, 3101, 3521, 4155, 4293, 9494, 10108, 10282, 10309, 12544, 13199, 15449, 15473, 15658, 15746, 15996, 16897, 18662, 20391, 20705, 20706, 20829, 24816, 25630, 27565, 29044, 29252, 29375 of 2023, Writ Petition Nos. 2453, 3206, 3379, 3596, 3941, 4770, 4775, 5281, 5797, 5802, 7291, 7654, 8583, 11439, 12202, 12203, 12332, 13209, 13851, 14128, 16477, 18008, 21871, 24692, 25216, 25254, 25323, 26531, 26568, 26851, 29253, 29405, 29631, 29843, 31238, 31922, 32672, 32681, 33637, 33648, 33673, 33676 of 2024, Writ Petition Nos. 3367, 3731, 13851, 15925 of 2025
Decided On : 19-09-2025
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
1. Conglomeration of writ petitions, though arising from distinct projects and differing promoters, converge upon a common grievance - the validity of a Circular dated 03-09-2020 issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Karnataka (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’ for short). This Circular, in essence, mandates the levy of “delay fee” for belated submission of quarterly updates and annual audit statements, without distinction to the scale of the project, the stage of development, or the peculiar circumstances surrounding it.
For the sake of convenience, the factual backdrop of writ petition Nos.4770 of 2024, 3379 of 2024 and 18662 of 2023 would be noticed, for it mirrors in substance the circumstances present in the other connected cases.
2. Sans details, facts germane are as follows: -
IN WRIT PETITION NO.4770 OF 2024
2.1 The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged in the business of development, construction and sale of residential buildings. The petitioner is planning to construct apartments under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana in the name and style of ‘Shubh Gruh’ in Sy.No.147, Plot No.102+103+139+140, Paninagar Layout, Indi Road Pass, near Royal Enfield Showroom, Bijapur-Vijayapura District. In compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for short) and Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’ for short) the petitioner applied for RERA registration on 07-04-2018. The application comes to be approved on 01-06-2018 with the petitioner being termed as a promoter and was allotted a RERA registration number. The petitioner then applied for plan sanction for construction of apartment aforementioned and announced the project canvassing for pre-bookings from the general public. The petitioner then tried to source pre-bookings in order to obtain commencement certificate for the project and when the things were then picking up, the nation was engulfed with COVID-19 due to which, the construction activity came to a grinding halt. It is the averment in the petition that the petitioner could not fetch even a single pre-booking for the project.
2.2. A Circular comes to be issued by the Authority on 03-09-2020. The Circular imposes ‘delay fee’ retrospectively for delayed submission of quarterly update and annual audit statement. The Circular encompasses every builder, developer or promoter to file quarterly update and annual audit statement in terms of Section 7 of the Act. The petitioner did not receive any pre-bookings for the apartment to be constructed and it has neither taken advances against the flat nor commenced any construction on the site. Commencement certificate is not obtained. It is the averment in the petition that, notwithstanding the aforesaid circumstance, late fee is imposed upon the petitioner.
2.3. The petitioner represents on 26-06-2023 seeking withdrawal of RERA registration due to non-receipt of pre-bookings and non-commencement of construction activity. The petitioner also applies for cancellation of plan, as nothing commenced from the date of sanction of the plan. The petitioner is said to have pursued the requisition for withdrawal with the 2nd respondent only to be known, that in terms of the afore-mentioned Circular, only if delay fee Rs. 7,90,000 as on 06-01-2024 is paid, further steps would be taken towards the request of the petitioner. It is in this way, delay fee is imposed upon the petitioner. This is called in question in the subject petition.
IN WRIT PETITION NO.3379 of 2024
3. The petitioner in the subject petition is an individual who has developed a project “Amogh Anagha Nivasayati” and is involved in the development and promotion of real estate projects in the State more particularly in Bangalore Urban and Rural areas. The Act, as observed hereinabove, comes into effect on 25-03-2016 and the Rules on 10-07-2017. The Circular imposing dela
The court established that the imposition of delay fees by circular without statutory authority contradicts the principles of law, rendering such fees arbitrary and illegal.
It is now well settled that the expression “fee” is also comprehended in the expression “tax” for the purpose of Article 265 and even for the collection of a “fee”, authority of law (i.e. legislative....
Amendments to municipal fee structures were quashed for failing to rectify judicially identified legal flaws, emphasizing the principle of quid pro quo in administrative fees.
The court ruled that imposing both Late Fees and General Penalties for GST return delays is improper; Late Fee suffices under applicable rules, reflecting legislative intent for compliance, not punit....
The Central Government is empowered under Section 211 of the Motor Vehicles Act to levy additional fees for delayed applications related to driving licenses and vehicle registrations, which are not p....
License fees can be regulatory rather than tied directly to specific services, requiring reasonable correlation with total expenses incurred.
Taxes not to be imposed save by authority of law - Article 265 of Constitution is the source of power for the Union and States to impose taxes in accordance with law. Article 265 of the Constitution ....
The notification issued by the State Government u/s 78 of the Registration Act, prescribing the registration fee on a graduated form on the basis of value of subject matter of the instrument is in ac....
Municipal Boards must justify licence fees based on actual services rendered; excessive fees may be deemed an illegal tax.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.