SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD BENCH
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
Santosh Basappa Ganagi - Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 103865 of 2025
Decided On : 19-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Santosh B. Malagoudar
For the Respondent: Girija S. Hiremath

The court can quash non-compoundable criminal proceedings in light of a mutual settlement and marriage between the parties, focusing on justice and personal circumstances.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - In view of a marriage solemnized between the accused and the victim after the victim attained majority, the court quashed proceedings under Special Case No.647/2024, affirming the principle that willingness to settle, even for non-compoundable offenses, can justify the quashing of proceedings when it serves the ends of justice. (Paras 10, 12, 13, 14)

(B) Legal Settlement - When parties have amicably settled their disputes, especially in personal matters, the court can exercise its powers to quash proceedings. The court emphasized that continuation of the case caused hardship to the newlyweds (Paras 3, 12).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner and victim entered into marriage after the victim attained majority, leading to the filing of the quashing petition to resolve proceedings that were causing difficulties for their families.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed the proceedings unnecessary as the parties sought to live peacefully after marrying and had settled their differences amicably (Para 12).

Issues: The main issues revolved around the validity of settling non-compoundable offenses and the implications of personal relationships in such legal contexts.

Ratio Decidendi: The right to have criminal proceedings quashed involving non-compoundable offenses lies with the circumstances of each case, particularly when settlement is voluntary and seeks to secure justice. The court recognized that the POCSO Act was not designed to punish young couples in love (Paras 8, 10, 11).

Result: Petition allowed; entire proceedings quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request to quash criminal proceedings. (Para 1)
2. settlement between parties and voluntary nature of marriage. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. powers of high court to quash non-compoundable offences. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 12)
4. judicial discretion in quashing serious offences upon settlement. (Para 9 , 11)
5. order to quash proceedings as per court's discretion. (Para 13)

ORDER :

1. The petitioner is before this Court with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in Special Case No.647/2024 pending before the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi, arising out of Crime No.165/2024 registered by Kittur Police Station, Belagavi, for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.2 jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled at the intervention of well-wishers, elders and parents of the petitioner and the victim girl. The petitioner has now married the victim girl after she attained the age of majority. The date of birth of the victim girl is 27.02.2007 and marriage of the petitioner with victim girl was solemnized on 14.04.2025. Petitioner and the victim girl are now residing together and are living as husband and wife. Pendency of this criminal case has been causing untold hardship to the newly wedded couple and also to their family members. Therefore, they have decided to give quietus to the dispute between the parties and live peacefully in future. It is under these circumstances, this petition is filed and the parties have come forward to report settlement before this Court by filing an application under Section 359 read with 528 of BNSS , 2023, which is supported by the affidavit of petitioner, respondent No.2, victim girl as well as her parents.

4. They submit that settlement between the parties is voluntary without therebeing any undue influence or coercion. Petitioner, victim girl, her parents and the first informant, who is the maternal aunt of the victim girl are present in-person before the Court. They have been identified by their respective Advocates.

5. In the application filed by the parties seeking permission of this Court to compound the alleged offences for which petitioner has been charge sheeted, in paragraph Nos.2 to 4, it is stated as follows:-

“2. It is pertinent to note, that with the intervention of the elders of both the families and the parents the Accused/petitioner and the victim girl both are married and living happily together. And now the present petitioner and the victim have settled and that allowing the criminal proceedings against the petitioner possibly may not get him convicted for the alleged offences.

3. The complainant and the victim don’t want to precipitate the matter ahead, as the accused and victim are happily married and want to lead a peaceful life.

4. As per the dictum of the case decided by Honble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab wherein it is held, when the offence is civil, where wrong is personal, and the matter is resolved between the parties consensually, proceedings can be quashed by the High Court. And so also, the High Court can quash the criminal proceedings where the conviction is not possible and the parties are ready to settle the case amongst themselves even if the offence did not fall under compoundable offences. Therefore in view of the said dictum it is humbly prayed to allow the parties to compound the offences and close the pending criminal case which is impugned in the present criminal petition.”

6. Along with the application, in addition to the affidavit of the parties, the adhaar card of the parties, are also produced. The marriage invitation card of the petitioner with the victim girl and their marriage photographs are produced separately.

7. Learned HCGP however has brought to the notice of this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top