SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.
M/s. Online Engineer India Development Center Private Limited - Appellant 
Versus 
The Commissioner Of Central Tax (Appeals-II) - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 31408 of 2024 (T-RES)
Decided on : 15-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. CHIDANANDA URS B.G., ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE

The court quashed the show-cause notice and orders, emphasizing reassessment of service tax liabilities based on legislative compliance and prior case law, without pre-issuance inquiry necessary.

Headnote:(A) Finance Act, 1994 - Section 65B(44) and Section 66B - Challenge to show-cause notice and orders-in-original regarding service tax liability - The court held that the petitioners' challenges were akin to those in prior similar cases, requiring the orders to be quashed and the matters to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. (Paras 3, 4, 11)

(B) Taxation Law - The statutory obligation on the assessee to comply with service tax regulations, and the validity of show-cause notices based on data from the Central Board of Direct Taxes, was affirmed, emphasizing no need for prior enquiry before issuance. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash a show-cause notice and related orders in connection with service tax liabilities, citing lack of jurisdiction and improper legislative intent. The Revenue countered with affirmations regarding compliance with statutory obligations and information validity.

Findings of Court:
All impugned orders were quashed; the matter is remitted for reconsideration with liberty to file pleadings.

Issues: The court addressed the validity of show-cause notices and the jurisdictional concerns raised by the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for the concerned authorities to reassess the matters afresh while considering previous judgments, thus highlighting the legislative intent behind tax compliance.

Result: The writ petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. court hears arguments and related cases. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. review of show-cause notices and compliance measures. (Para 3 , 7)

ORDER :

M.NAGAPRASANNA, J.

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayers:

"i. Quash the impugned order passed by Respondent No.1 in OIA No.208209/2024-25 CT dated 30.08.2024 which is herewith enclosed as Annexure "A" which is without jurisdiction and opposed to legislative intent; and

ii. Quash the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Respondent No.2, in OIO No.37/2023-24 Adjn.ND.3 dated 27.10.2023 which is herewith enclosed as Annexure "C".

iii. Quash the show cause notice issued by the Respondent No.3 dated 31.12.2020 in No.56514/2020 in File No.GEXCOM/AE/VRFN/TPD/383/2020-AE-COMMR- CGST-BENGALURU(N) which is herewith enclosed as Annexure "G".

iv. Pass any other order to give any other direction as this Honorable Court deems fit and appropriate in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Shri Chidananda Urs B.G., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Aravind V. Chavan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the material on record.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue in the lis is akin to what is decided by the Coordinate Bench in W.P.No.11154/2023 (T-IT) C/w W.P.No.15959/2021 (T-RES) and connected matters, between M/S KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND ANOTHER disposed on 03.07.2024. He would submit that several of the petition was disposed in the same terms.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue would not dispute the position.

5. I, therefore deem it appropriate to notice what the Co-ordinate Bench has held in W.P.No.11154/2023 (T-IT) C/w W.P.No.15959/2021 (T-RES) and connected matters, between M/S KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND ANOTHER disposed on 03.07.2024, which reads as follows:

“2. In all these matters, the proceedings by way of show-cause notice under the Finance Act for service tax liability have been initiated on the basis of inputs received from the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the basis of Form 26AS/Income Tax returns filed.

3. The details of the writ petitions and the stages are as follows:

Challenge to Show-cause Challenge to Orders-in-Original Notice Column No.1 Column No.2

Challenge to Show-cause
Notice
Challenge to Orders-in-Original
Column No.1Column No.2
WP No.16891/2022WP No.12840/2023
WP No.13445/2023WP No.15832/2022
WP No.15959/2021WP No.3318/2023
WP No.24822/2022WP No.14425/2022
WP No.8514/2023WP No.15018/2022
WP No.24650/2022
WP No.12906/2023
WP No.22063/2022
WP No.19792/2022
WP No.25156/2022
WP No.5896/2023
WP No.17407/2023
WP No.11154/2023
WP No.9765/2022
WP No.17591/2022
WP No.1754/2023
WP No.8858/2023
WP No.16501/2023
WP No.7071/2023
WP No.9906/2023
WP No.8409/2023
WP No.8184/2023
WP No.16170/2022
WP No.1198/2024
WP No.14092/2023
WP No.341/2023
WP No.274/2023
WP No.12003/2022
WP No.13813/2022
WP No.7829/2023
WP No.20282/2022
WP No.19000/2022
WP No.8336/2023
WP No.10238/2023
WP No.6756/2024

4. After having heard the matters on various occasions, the Union of India have taken a stand and filed affidavit of the Principal Commissioner, Central Taxes.

5. Sri.N.Venkataraman, learned Additional Solicitor General who was present before the court on 27.06.2024 had submitted that they desire that the matters be resolved and accordingly have putforth a proposed mechanism and made certain suggestions in the affidavit filed. The relevant extract of the affidavit filed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, presently holding charge of Bengaluru West and additional charge of Bengaluru East Commissionerate reads as hereunder:

"I, Kiran Verma, working as Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, presently holding charge of Bengaluru West and additional charge of Bengaluru East Commissionerate, Bengaluru do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

I am working as Principal Commissioner of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top