SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
D K Singh, Venkatesh Naik T, JJ.
Ms. Tisa Robinson, W/o Justin Thomas T - Petitioner
Versus 
The National Medical Commission, Represented By Its Secretary And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 32629 of 2024, Writ Petition No. 28510 of 2024, Writ Petition No. 29035 of 2024
Decided On : 10-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Anup Raj, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. N Shetty, Advocate, Sri. Sudev Hegde, Aga, Sri. N K Ramesh, Advocate, Sri. Sachin B S, Advocate, Sri. Venugopal L, Advocate

Admissions to postgraduate medical courses must comply with established counseling regulations; deviations render them illegal and unregularizable.

Headnote:(A) Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 - Regulations 4.3 and 4.5 - Admissions in postgraduate medical courses - Submissions made for regularizing admissions that occurred without proper counseling process rejected - Colleges must follow laid down guidelines and regulations strictly. (Paras 1, 20, 28)

(B) Authority of Medical Councils - The National Medical Commission has the authority to ensure compliance with counseling regulations and penalize institutions violating these provisions. (Paras 18, 27)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, having appeared for NEET-PG 2023, contested their non-admission to postgraduate medical courses due to alleged vacant seats being filled improperly after the conclusion of counseling rounds at the Kannachur Institute of Medical Sciences. (Paras 2, 8, 12)

Findings of Court:
The admissions of the petitioners in the postgraduate courses were found to violate the mandatory regulations, thus declaring them illegal and unregularizable. (Paras 28, 30)

Issues: Whether the admissions of the petitioners were lawful within the framework of relevant medical education regulations and if the colleges could fill vacancies independently of the established counseling processes. (Paras 18, 28)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that admissions not conducted through the mandated counseling process are illegal under the PGMER, and institutions cannot admit students autonomously without adherence to these regulations. (Paras 22, 28)

Result: Writ petitions dismissed, and orders for measures to be taken against the colleges involved.

Table of Content
1. similar facts and admission processes in medical college cases (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. invalidity of admissions without proper counseling procedures (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. nmc requirements for valid admissions and counseling (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. regulatory standards governing medical admissions; penalties for violations (Para 19 , 21 , 22)
5. conclusions on admissions being illegal and consequences (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
6. final determination and directives regarding illegal admissions (Para 28 , 29 , 30)

ORDER :

D K SINGH, J.

These three writ petitions have similar facts and same questions of law, therefore, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The brief facts of each petition are stated here under.

W.P.No.28510/2024

2. The two petitioners in this petition had appeared in NEET-PG 2023 for admission in the post graduate medical courses. Though the petitioners had participated in the online counseling sessions but did not get admission in any college for pursuing post graduate medical courses. The 6th respondent - College namely, Kannachur Institute of Medical Sciences had admitted the 1st petitioner for MD in Radio Diagnosis and the 2nd petitioner for MS in Orthopaedics through physical admission process. The petitioners were not allotted the said college through counseling for admission in the post graduate medical courses as mentioned above.

3. The case of the petitioners is that the two candidates who were allotted the 6th respondent - Institution for MD Course namely, Dr. Deepu Kumar Jha and Dr. Hemraj Saini surrendered their seats on the last date of counseling. The 6th respondent - Institution is a minority institution established in the year 2016 with an initial intake of 150 MBBS seats. The National Medical Counsel (for short 'the NMC'), however, has increased the intake of MBBS seats from 150 to 200 for the academic year 2024-25 onwards. The 6th respondent - Institution has also been approved for 44 post graduate degree seats in MD and MS in various specialties. The last date for admission after special stray vacancy round of counseling for post graduate medical courses was 30.11.2023 for the academic year-2023-24.

4. It is the case of the 6th respondent that in the second round of counseling, the Karnataka Examination Authority (for short 'the KEA') on 06.10.2023 allotted one post graduate seat in MD (Radiology) in the college to one Dr. Hemraj Saini and one seat in MS (Orthopaedic) to Dr. Deepu Kumar Jha. These students reported to the college on 12.10.2023. The mop up counseling round commenced on 13.10.2023 and last date for joining was notified as 18.10.2023. When the mop up was on going, the KEA on 15.10.2023 issued notification to conduct stray vacancy round. Thereafter, on 17.10.2023, the KEA issued notification calling for fresh registration upto 18.10.2023 and stray vacancy round of counseling was from 18.10.2023 to 19.10.2023 and last date for completion of admission process was notified as 21.10.2023. However, the MCC has notified the last date of admission to post graduate courses as 25.10.2023 i.e., after stray vacancy round of counseling.

5. According to the College Dr. Hemraj Saini and Dr. Deepu Kumar Jha, who were admitted in MD (Radiology) and MS (Orthopaedic) in the college on 25.10.2023 on the last date of admission, addressed the e-mails and letters to the 6th respondent - Institution requesting for cancellation of their admissions and on the very same day, the petitioners approached the respondent - Institution and requested it to grant them admission under the said vacant seats. It is also the case of the 6th respondent - Institution that on the very same date i.e., on 25.10.2023 the college addressed a communication to the KEA and Directorate of Medical Education (for short 'the DME'). It is further stated on 07.11.2023 the 6th respondent - Institution addressed a communication to the KEA requesting the KE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top