ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Madhu Saini – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in both writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts related to student admissions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. interim court orders regarding examinations. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. defendant's objections to writ petitions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. specific defenses and claims made by respondents. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. response from the respondent college. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. response from the dental council of india. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. university's response regarding admissions. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. details on neet eligibility consideration. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 10. court's recognition of undisputed facts in the case. (Para 70 , 71) |
| 11. main issues of eligibility and legality of admission. (Para 72 , 73) |
| 12. conclusion with directions from the judgement. (Para 135) |
JUDGMENT
1. As the issues involved in both the present two writ petitions are common, therefore, these writ petitions are decided by this common judgment.
2. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6207/2020 has been filed by the petitioners, who are students of Master in Dental Surgery (in short "MDS"), seeking direction against the responden
A Sudha vs. University of Mysore and Anr.
Ashok Chand Singhvi vs. University of Jodhpur
CBSE vs. Sheena Peethambaran (2003) 7 SCC 719)
Dilip Singh vs. State of UP & Ors.
Modern Dental College and Research Centre & Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Priya Gupta vs. State of Chattisgarh & Ors.
Rajendra Prasad Mathur vs. Karnataka University and Anr.
Ranjan Purohit & Ors. vs. RUHS & Ors.
Saraswati Educational Charitable Trust and Anr. vs. Union of India and Ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Jainarayan Chouksey & Ors.
Union of India vs. Federation of Self-financed Ayurvedic Colleges, Punjab & Ors.
Admissions in educational institutions must strictly adhere to centralized counselling processes as mandated by precedents to maintain fairness and transparency in selections.
Admission into Postgraduate Course in Dental Sciences – Undue sympathy would lead to perpetuating illegality and giving premium to students who got admissions illegally.
Admissions to medical colleges must be based on merit and conducted through authorized counseling, and any admission contrary to the mandatory provisions cannot be approved.
Admissions to BDS courses granted under relaxed percentile criteria by the State were illegal, emphasizing that only the Central Government holds the authority to set qualifying standards for NEET.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admission of students to the MBBS course must adhere to the proper procedure for filling vacant seats as per the judgment of the Apex Cour....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.