IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vipin Sanghi, Jasmeet Singh, JJ.
Deepanshu Bhadoriya - Appellant
Versus
Medical Council of India - Respondent
LPA 581 of 2019
Decided On : 09-09-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admissions should follow centralized counselling systems. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. merit does not justify bypassing admission processes. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. institutional responsibility in managing admissions. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. equity cannot override lawful procedures. (Para 17 , 24 , 26) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; institutions must adhere to lawful admission protocols. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT
Vipin Sanghi, J. (ORAL)
C.M. Nos.14820/2021 & 15797/2021
1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applications stand disposed of.
LPA 581/2019 and C.M. Nos.40061/2019, 14730/2021 & 15796/2021
3. We have heard submissions of learned senior counsel for the appellants, as well as learned counsel for the Medical Council of India (MCI); State of MP, and the respondent Medical College/ university, and we proceed to decide the present appeal.
4. This appeal is directed against the judgement dated 07.08.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) 10933/2018 titled Deepanshu Bhadhoria and Ors. Vs. Medical Council of India and Ors. The said petition had been preferred by the appellants herein. The learned Single Judge, vide impugned judgement, did not find merit in the petition, and the same was dismissed.
5. We would refer to the appellants, as petitioners, in the present judgement.
6. The petitioners participated in the NEET conducted by the CBSE for admission to the under-graduate medical courses in the year 2016. The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court vide its judgement rendered on 02.05.2016 in Modern Dental College & Research Centre & Ors. Vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., (2016) 7 SCC 353, held that admissions to all Government and Private Medical Colleges in the county would be held through the centralized counselling system on the basis of the result of the NEET examination. The petitioners were eligible and qualified to participate in the centralized counselling conducted by the respondent State Government, i.e. the State of Madhya Pradesh, for admissions to under- graduate medical courses in the said State. The respondent Medical College i.e. the L.N. Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bhopal is also one of the Medical Colleges, wherein admissions for the Academic Year 2016-17 had to be made through the centralized counselling. The centralized counselling was to be conducted by the Department of Medical Education (DME).
7. It appears that despite the aforesaid judgement, admissions were being made contrary to the said decision by the Medical Colleges, through private counselling. The Supreme Court took note of the same, and vide order dated 22.09.2016 - while dealing with the Contempt Petition titled "State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jainarayan Chaouksey and Ors.", (2016) 9 SCC 412 held as follows :-
" We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We observe that mandate of our judgment was to hold centralised entrance test followed by centralised state counselling by the State to make it a one composite process. We, therefore, direct that admission to all medical seats shall be conducted by centralised counselling only by the state Government and none else.
If any counselling has been done by any College or University and any admission to any medical seat has been given so far, such admission shall stand cancelled forthwith and admission shall be given only as per centralised counselling done by the State Government.
We may note at this stage that the State Government has done the first counselling.- However, the learned Additional Solicitor , General has made a statement at the Bar that the State Government is ready to undertake the entire process afresh and assures that it would be completed by 30th September, 2016 which is the last date for admission. We also feel that it is a proper course of action inasmuch as it will enable the private institutions to send their representatives at the place of counselling as per the information which may be displayed by t
Admissions in educational institutions must strictly adhere to centralized counselling processes as mandated by precedents to maintain fairness and transparency in selections.
Regulations governing medical admissions require adherence to common counselling processes; failure to consider due process and fair opportunity to institutions harms student rights.
Admissions to medical colleges must be based on merit and conducted through authorized counseling, and any admission contrary to the mandatory provisions cannot be approved.
Admission into Postgraduate Course in Dental Sciences – Undue sympathy would lead to perpetuating illegality and giving premium to students who got admissions illegally.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admission of students to the MBBS course must adhere to the proper procedure for filling vacant seats as per the judgment of the Apex Cour....
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
The court emphasized the application of Rule 12 (8) (ka) of the M.P. Medical Education (Admission) Rules, 2018, which governs the inclusion of vacant seats in subsequent rounds of counselling.
The issuance of Notice No. 10 dated 26-9-2023 by respondent No. 4 was in violation of the rules and regulations of the NMC Act, and the communication/order dated 18-10-2023 by respondent No. 2 was ju....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.