JUDGMENT :

V. SRISHANANDA, J.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties.

2. Present appeal is filed by the defendant challenging the judgment passed in RA No.11/2019 in reversing the judgment passed in O.S.No.163/2017.

3. Facts in brief which are utmost necessary for disposal of the appeal are as under:

3.1. A suit for permanent injunction came to be filed by the plaintiff by contending that he is the owner in possession of the immovable property which is described as under and hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property:

Land bearing Sy.No.5/2 measuring 4 acres 14 guntas, assessed at Rs.8.52 paisa situated at Kongathimmanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Chinthamani Taluk is bounded as follows:

East by – Land of defendant

West by – Own land

North by – Sy.No.5/3 and 5/4

South by – Land of Krishnappa and Narayanappa.

3.2. Plaintiff further contended that he purchased the suit property from Sri.Venkatanarayanappa through registered sale deed dated 24.08.1967 and from that date onwards, he is in possession and enjoyment of the suit property to the extent of 3 acres 17 guntas. But when he was put into possession of the land based on the boundaries, the land measured 4 acres 14 guntas and plain