SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT KALABURAGI BENCH
H.P. SANDESH, T.M. NADAF, JJ.
The State of Karnataka - Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar S/o Late Bankatsingh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 201525 of 2023
Decided On : 01-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Maya T.R.
For the Respondent: Siddarudha B. Pujari

The authorities must extend benefits of regularization to similarly situated individuals, adhering to principles of equality and prior judicial decisions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition calling into question the order of Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal directing regularization of service for an applicant who served for 25 years as daily wage employee. Tribunal found no differentiation between applicant and similarly situated persons previously granted benefits per Official Memorandum dated 19.04.2006. (Paras 1, 4, 11, 14)

(B) Administrative Law - Regularization of service - Authorities are bound to extend benefits to similarly situated individuals based on prior judicial decisions, highlighting the principle of equality. (Paras 11, 12, 14)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was appointed in 1987 and continuously served as a daily wage employee until retirement without regularization, while similar employees were regularized.

Findings of Court:
The order of the Tribunal is justified; State's failure to differentiate between similarly situated individuals was noted.

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order for regularization was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that the principles of equality necessitate the extension of benefits to similarly situated persons as established by previous decisions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed; State ordered to comply with the Tribunal's directions within two months.

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding employment and regularization. (Para 1 , 3)
2. arguments regarding delay in regularization. (Para 4 , 6)
3. final conclusion and directive for compliance. (Para 8)
4. court's analysis on similar cases for regularization. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. ratio guiding regularization of similar claims. (Para 13)

ORDER :

1. Writ Petition is filed by the State under Article 226 of Constitution of India, calling in question the order dated 05.06.2020 in application No.2046/2017 passed by Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Kalaburgi, whereby the Tribunal allowed the application and directed the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for regularization of his service as considered to the co-officials as per the Official Memorandum dated 19.04.2006 and grant all consequential benefits within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

2. The parties shall be referred to as per their rankings before the Tribunal for easy reference.

3. A brief outline of the facts leading to filing of the present petition are as under:

The name applicant/private respondent herein has been sponsored by the District Employment Exchange Office (Annexure-A1) and directed respondent No.5 to interview for the post of ‘D’ group employment. The respondent No.4 has conducted interview and appointed applicant to the post of peon as per order dated 01.09.1987 (Annexure-A2). Subsequently, the services of the applicant has been continued in the Health Department as group ‘D’ group employee on daily wages from 10.09.1987. The respondent No.3 has sought the service records from respondent No.4 in order to regularize the services of the applicant (Annexure-A5). In response to requisition by respondent No.3, respondent No.4 has furnished the information along with salary statement from September 1987 to November 2007 to respondent No.3 (Annexure-A6). The applicant till his retirement has been continued as daily wage employee even though the information stated supra was supplied, but was not considered for regularization. The applicant had worked for a total period of 25 years 9 months till his retirement as per Official Memorandum dated 15.06.2013 (Annexure-A7). The appointment of the applicant was made against a vacant post and subsequent to establishment of Zilla Panchayat with effort from 01.04.1987, all the departments stood transferred to Zilla Panchayat and as such the services of applicant also stood transferred to Zilla Panchayat by Government order dated 01.04.1987 to 1994. Certain persons similarly situated that of the applicant approached this Court in Writ Petition No.33541-33571/1998 and other connected cases. This Court on 10.09.1999 directed the respondents to consider the case of petitioners in the said petitions for regularization. The order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court was called in question in Writ Appeal No.2765-2905/2000 (S-Res), which comes to be dismissed on 23.01.2001. Subsequently the government issued Official Memorandum dated 19.04.2006 and the co-officials similarly situated as that of applicant have been regularized who have completed 10 years of service. The applicant preferred a Writ Petition before this Court in W.P.No.101986/2013 at Kalaburagi Bench seeking regularization in terms of Official Memorandum dated 19.04.2006. This Court by order dated 16.12.2013 relegated the petitioner to the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in view of alternative and efficacious remedy available to the applicant. Thereafter, the present application No.2046/2017 comes to be filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the applicant rendered from 10.09.1987 to 15.06.2013 with all consequential benefits and direct the respondents to extend the services benefits under the provisions of the Karnataka Daily Wage Employees Welfare Act, 2012 along with an interlocutory application seeking for condonation of delay in approaching the Tribunal. Before the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top