Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
ASHOK S.KINAGI
Mallamma, W/o. S. Mallappa – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Ansari, S/o. Hasamuddin Ansari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ASHOK S. KINAGI, J.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘M.V.Act, 1988” for short) by the petitioners being dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by Tribunal in MVC No.230/2015 dated 06.07.2018 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge & MACT-IV, Hosapete.
2. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of this appeal, are as follows:
On 12.02.2014, at about 7.50 p.m., a KSRTC bus bearing Reg.No.KA-07/F-913, due to mechanical defect, the bus was stationed on NH-7 Road, near Venkatagiri Kote, Swamy daba. The deceased was lying below the said bus to carryout its repair. At that time, the driver of the bus had taken all precautions by putting the indicator light, showing visibility of the stationed bus for repairs to other moving vehicles on the road. At that time, a lorry bearing Reg.No.MH-40/N-6264 came in a rash and negligent manner, and dashed against the stationed bus from the backside. The deceased sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to the injures. The petitioners being the legal representatives of the deceased filed a claim petition seeking compensation on the ground that the d
The court ruled that an expired driving license does not constitute a breach of insurance policy conditions, and deductions for personal expenses in compensation calculations should respect establish....
The court ruled that in the absence of documented income, the notional income must be assessed according to established guidelines, affecting compensation calculations.
Liability under insurance policies is determined by the driver's qualifications; enhanced compensation should account for proper income assessment and dependant loss.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of claimants to compensation for loss of dependency and consortium under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the need for just comp....
The court affirmed that the insurance company is liable for compensation when the driver, even if related to the owner, was covered under the policy, emphasizing the principle of just compensation.
Insurance companies cannot evade liability if they fail to prove the driver's lack of a valid license and if the vehicle was insured.
The court clarified that an insurance company remains liable for damages despite any lapses in the driver's license, determining compensation following laid-down principles for just awards in motor a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
