IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Priyanka N., W/o Karthik Radhakrishna – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Medical Education – Respondent
ORDER :
MAINTAINABILITY
The petitioners are before this Court calling in question several orders of discharge and consequential relieving orders from duties as Tutors in the Kempegowda Institute of Nursing and R.V.S. College of Nursing Sciences and have sought for a consequential direction directing respondents 3 and 4 to forthwith restore the petitioners into service as Nursing Tutors in the respective institutes of Nursing along with other consequential reliefs.
2. Facts, in brief, adumbrated are as follows: -
The 4th respondent is Rajya Vokkaligara Sangha (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Sangha or Society’ for short). The 4th respondent runs educational institutions, two of which are respondents 2 and 3/Kempegowda Institute of Nursing and R.V.S. College of Nursing Sciences. On 28-05-2024, it appears that the Governing Council of the Society then existing, passes a resolution to the effect that vacancies of Nursing Tutors should be filled by direct recruitment. In pursuance thereof, on 14-09-2024 an Employment Notification was published inviting applications from eligible candidates to fill up the posts of Nursing Tutors in the respective nursing institutions. On 14-10-2024, it is th









ROHTAS INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. ROHTAS INDUSTRIES STAFF UNION
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA v. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR
T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.K. SAKSENA v. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.