SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Nagappa S/O Mahabaleshwara and ors. – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Karnataka Rep.By Its Principal Secretary Department Of Co-Operation And Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 108033 of 2024, Writ Petition No. 108009 of 2024
Decided On : 14-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Vishwanath Hegde, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. Ramesh B. Chigari, Aga, Sri. G.V. Bharmagoudar, Advocate, Sri. Shriprasad J Joshi, Advocate

Electoral disputes about voter eligibility must be addressed post-election results under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, not by writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Section 70(2) - Election dispute resolution - Petitioners sought to quash final ineligible voters lists and facilitate their participation in upcoming society elections; however, court emphasized prior ruling that electoral disputes should be addressed post-election results only under statutory provisions. (Paras 3-4)

(B) Legal Remedy - It was held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not the appropriate remedy for electoral eligibility disputes, reaffirming the necessity of following statutory processes after elections. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, declared ineligible voters in society elections for 2024-2029 and 2025-2030, challenged the ineligible voters lists and sought rights to vote in the elections. Interim orders allowed them to cast votes pending writ resolution.

Findings of Court:
Writ petitions were disposed of with direction for timely election results announcement while leaving open all contentions related to the election results under applicable law.

Issues: The main issues include addressing the ineligibility of voters and the appropriate legal remedy for election disputes prior to the announcement of results.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that challenges to electoral eligibility must follow post-election procedures under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, affirming earlier legal principles restricting pre-election judiciary intervention.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek relief against ineligible voters list. (Para 1)
2. interim orders allowed petitioners to vote pending outcome. (Para 2)
3. previous ruling clarifies eligibility disputes to be resolved post-election. (Para 3 , 4)
4. writ petitions disposed; results to be announced by returning officer. (Para 5)

ORDER :

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.

1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

In W.P.No.108033/2024

A) Issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the Loanee final ineligible voters list issued by Respondent No.4 marked at Annexure B in so far as petitioners no. 1 to 439 are concerned in the election to the board of 6th respondent society for the term 2024 to 2029.

b) Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the non Loanee final ineligible voters list issued by Respondent No.4 marked at Annexure C in so far as Petitioners No. 440 to 469 are concerned in the election to the board of 6th respondent Society for the term 2024 to 2029.

c) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct the elections to the 6th respondent society for the term 2024-2029 scheduled to be held on 5-1-2025, permitting the petitioners to cast their vote and participate in the election process in terms of Annexure A dated 4- 12-2024 issued by respondent no.5.

d) Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

In W.P.No.108009/2024

a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the final ineligible voters list issued by respondent no.5 marked at Annexure B in so far as petitioners are concerned in the election to the board of 6th respondent society for the term 2025 to 2030.

b) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct the elections to the 6 respondent society for the term 2025-2030 scheduled to be held on 05.01.2025, permitting the petitioners to cast their vote and participate in the election process in terms of Annexure A.

c) Pass such other orders as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. This Court by way of various interim orders had permitted the petitioners, who were declared to be ineligible voters, to cast their vote in the elections of the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in separate ballot boxes.

3. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others, [W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022] has after considering the matter in detail had come to a categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the conduct of election, a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy and any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as regards the election under Section 70 (2) of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959, after the announcement of the results by counting even the votes cast by the petitioners.

4. The said judgment not having been challenged and having attained finality, the fact being more or less similar would equally apply to the present matters.

5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The Writ Petitions are disposed of.

ii) The Returning Officer in the above matters is directed to announce the result within seven days of the receipt of a copy of this order by taking into account the vote cast by the petitioners in the above matters.

iii) In the event of any proceeding being filed in relation to the results of the election under Section 70 (2) of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959, all the contentions raised herein and any that may be raised are left open for consideration in accordance with the applicable law, this Court has not expressed any opinion on those issues.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top