SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1672

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Yallur Omkar Mallikarjun And Ors. - Petitioners
Versus 
The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Co-Operation And Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.107753 of 2024 (CS-EL/M)
Decided On : 04-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri N. Ravindranath Kamath, Senior Counsel, Sri. Shriprasad J. Joshi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. Ramesh B. Chigari, Aga For, Sri. G.V.Bharamagoudar, Advocate, Sri. Pruthvi K.S., Advocate, Sri. Anand Ashtekar & Sri. Akshay Katti, Advocates, Sri. Yash R. Nadakarni, Advocate

Election-related disputes regarding voter eligibility must be raised under Section 70(2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act post-election results, not via Article 226.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Writ petition for direction to incorporate names in the final voters list and allow voting - Court held that any dispute regarding eligibility should be raised under Section 70(2) of the Act post-election results. Court referenced prior case to assert that Article 226 is not the proper remedy for electoral disputes. (Paras 1-3)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought permission to vote in upcoming elections after being declared ineligible. Interim permits were granted under conditions that the votes be counted separately.

Findings of Court:
The Writ Petition was disposed with instructions for the Returning Officer to announce results, considering the votes cast by petitioners.

Issues: Whether the eligibility or ineligibility can be contested under Article 226 pre-election results.

Ratio Decidendi: The court referenced established precedent to conclude that election-related disputes fall under Section 70(2) post-election.

Result: Writ Petition disposed.

-

ORDER :

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.

1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

A. Issue a writ of Mandamus as direct the Respondent No.02 to 05 to incorporate the names of the Petitioners in the Final Eligible Voters List and permit them to cast their votes in the elections for the Respondent no. 05 to be held on 22/12/2024 as per the Calendar of Events marked at Annexure-A.

B. Issue a Writ of Mandamus and direct the Respondent No. 05 and any Respondent to permit the petitioners herein who wish to contest the elections the contest in the elections to be held on 22.12.2024.

C. Grant any other relief as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity.

2. This Court by way of various interim orders had permitted the petitioners who were declared to be ineligible voters to cast their vote in the elections of the Society, subject to the result of the writ petition and that the votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in separate ballot boxes.

3. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S.Raju vs. State of Karnataka & others, [W.P.No.8502/2022 dated 7.6.2022] has after considering the matter in detail had come to a categorical conclusion that any irregularity in the conduct of election, a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be the proper remedy and any dispute as regards the eligibility or ineligibility and the deficiencies in finalization of final electoral list, could only be considered in a dispute raised as regard the election under Section 70 (2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 , after the announcement of the results by counting even the votes cast by the petitioners.

-

4. The said judgment not having been challenged and having attained finality, the fact being more or less similar would equally apply to the present matter.

5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The Writ Petition is disposed of

ii) The Returning Officer in the above matter is directed to announce the result within seven days of the receipt of a copy of this order by taking into account the vote cast by the petitioner in the above matter.

-

iii) In the event of any proceeding being filed in relation to the results of the election under Section 70 (2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 , all the contentions raised herein and any that may be raised are left open for consideration in accordance with the applicable law, this court has not expressed any opinion on those issues.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top