SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 1304

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background on power generation and petitioner's activities. (Para 1 , 2)
2. state's directive during extraordinary circumstances. (Para 5 , 9)
3. legality of financial conditions imposed by the state. (Para 10 , 12 , 30)
4. state's powers in public interest concerning generating stations. (Para 24 , 27)
5. clause 1(d) of the order recognized as illegal. (Para 39)
6. concluding order to refund the financial benefit. (Para 40 , 41)

ORDER :

N.S. SANJAY GOWDA, J.

1. The petitioner herein is a company running sugar factories across the State, and also generates green power using bagasse. The excess power generated was being sold by the petitioner through the Indian Energy Exchange registered with the 4th respondent (mainly inter-State supply through open access). In this regard, clearance was obtained by the petitioner from the State Load Despatch Centre (“SLDC”) on 29.09.2023.

2. The petitioner, though initially did not generate requisite surplus power for sale, thereafter attempted to sell the same through open access, and this was denied by the 2nd respondent stating that due to imposition of the provisions of Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (“the Act”), the petitio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top