SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 631

N. S. SANJAY GOWDA
BRINDAVAN HYDROPOWER PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: SHRIDHAR PRABHU
For the Respondents: ARAVIND KAMATH, H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SHAHBAAZ HUSSAIN, B.N. PRAKASH, HEMALATHA V.

ORDER :

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

(I)

Brief facts

(II)

Chronology of events relating to open access in respect of mini hydel plants

(III)

Submissions of the petitioners

(IV)

Submissions of the respondents

(V)

Questions which arise for consideration in the subject petitions

(VI)

Basic principles to determine the validity of a delegated/subordinate legislation

(VII)

History of electricity laws and the role of the state as prescribed thereunder

(VIII)

Banking of electricity - provision of banking facility and the grievance raised by the present petitioners

(IX)

Conclusion

(X)

Directions and suggestions to the KERC

(XI)

Order on the subsequent Interlocutory Applications filed by the petitioners

(I) BRIEF FACTS:

1. Petitioners are the Companies engaged in the business of Hydro Power generation who had entered into agreements for Wheeling and Banking with the transmission and distribution licensees.

2. They are before this Court challenging the validity of the Rules framed by the Central Government in the year 2022 called the Electricity (Promoting Renewable Energy Through Green Energy Op

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top