Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Sunil @ Chikka Sunil S/o Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petitioner’s procedural background. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding evidence and trial continuation. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. analysis of previous judgments relevant to co-accused. (Para 4) |
| 4. final order quashing proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 6) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the continuation of proceedings against him in C.C.No.7653/2016 for an offence punishable under Section 397 of the IPC.
2. Heard Sri. Rajashekara R.V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Addl. SPP for respondent No.1 and have perused the material on record.
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
The petitioner along with others gets embroiled in a crime in Crime No.542/2015 for the aforesaid offence. The police after investigation, file a charge sheet in C.C.No.17204/2015. The petitioner at the relevant point in time was not available for trial. Accused Nos.1 to 4 were tried in S.C.No.490/2016 and against the petitioner, a separate split charge was directed to be framed on account of his absence during the trial. It transpires that the concerned Court, by its judgment dated 25.07.2018,
In the absence of independent evidence against an accused where co-accused have been acquitted, proceedings should be quashed to uphold judicial efficiency.
The acquittal of co-accused on similar charges entitles the petitioner to quash proceedings against him due to the principle of parity, necessitating a lack of independent evidence.
The acquittal of co-accused on similar charges allows for quashing proceedings against the petitioner due to the lack of independent evidence, promoting judicial efficiency.
The acquittal of co-accused leads to the quashing of proceedings against a petitioner when the charges are identical and no independent evidence supports further prosecution.
The acquittal of co-accused entitled the petitioner to quash proceedings against him under the doctrine of parity, as no independent evidence was presented against him.
The acquittal of co-accused necessitates the quashing of charges against similarly situated accused, reinforcing the doctrine of parity in criminal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
