Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Sachidanandamurthy V.C., S/o. T. Channappa – Appellant
Versus
B. Satish, S/o. Byralingaiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the complaint. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner and respondents. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on case records. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal principles regarding cognizance and limitation. (Para 11) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
1. This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.PC is filed with a prayer to set aside the order dated 29.11.2024 passed in PCR.No.187/2022 by the Court of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Magadi, Ramanagara District.
2. Heard the petitioner - party in person and the learned Counsel for the respondents.
3. Petitioner herein has filed a private complaint in PCR.No.187/2022 before the Court of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Magadi, Ramanagara District, against the respondents alleging that they have committed the offences punishable under Sections 143, 109, 120B, 504, 506, 167, 203, 192, 211, 499 read with 34 IPC.
4. The gist of allegations made against the accused is, that accused no.1 had filed a false criminal case against the petitioner, and accused no.2 had colluded with accused no.1 and had filed a charge sheet in the said case against the peti
The dismissal of a private complaint is justified when prior similar complaints are dismissed for lack of evidence, and cognizance may be barred under procedural provisions.
A trial court must assess whether a prima facie case exists for proceeding with charges, without conducting a mini trial, and a civil dispute does not preclude criminal liability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that there must be sufficient material to arraign a person as an additional accused, and the court has the jurisdiction to quash an order if it inf....
Discharge of accused – If there is sufficient ground for presuming that accused has committed offence, order of discharge cannot be passed and accused has to face trial.
The court emphasized the importance of considering malafide complaints and the principle of quashing FIR in cases of malafide intention.
The withdrawal of a complaint amounts to acquittal of the accused, and a second complaint on the same facts and cause of action is not maintainable. The revisional court's power is limited to procedu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
