Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ANU SIVARAMAN, Vijaykumar A.Patil
T N Sumithra, W/O Late Rangaswamy Rangappa – Appellant
Versus
Dr. R. Sharmila, W/O Dr. N. S. Prakash – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, J.
This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2020 passed by the III Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-25) in O.S.No.7188/2016.
2. We have heard Shri. Chandrachud A, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Shri. Raghavendra V, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent jointly submit that the matter is amicably settled between the parties and they have filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. We have perused the clauses of the compromise petition, they are in accordance with law and not opposed to public policy.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent identified the parties present before the Court. We had a detailed interaction with the parties. The parties expressed that the terms of compromise are drawn based on their instructions and on their own volition.
5. The said statement is placed on record.
6. In view of the above statement, the compromise pet
The court confirmed that a compromise in a partition case is valid if voluntarily entered without coercion, facilitating expedient resolution through final decree proceedings.
Parties may settle disputes amicably through a lawful compromise, which is accepted by the court.
A compromise between parties, if accepted by the court, is binding and results in the cessation of claims while outlining property rights and financial settlements.
The court upheld the voluntary compromise between parties regarding partition claims and confirmed the modification of the decree, emphasizing the absence of coercion and mutual satisfaction with the....
The court validates a compromise petition concerning family property, affirming the agreement's binding nature on all parties involved, which leads to the final decree.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
