Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
RAJESH RAI K.
Thingale Vikramarjuna Hegde, S/o. Sri Thingale Ravindra Hegde – Appellant
Versus
Manorama S. Shetty, D/o. Late Seethamma Heggadthi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and relationships (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arguments of both parties regarding tenancy rights (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. court's analysis on tenancy claims and legal standards (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 4. principle of fraud and implications of false claims (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 5. conclusion and imposition of costs due to frivolous litigation (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
ORDER :
RAJESH RAI K., J.
'Fraud' is an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing something by taking unfair advantage of another. In fraud, one gains at the loss and the cost of another. The instant case is one of such kind.
2. The petitioners and the contesting respondents are the family members. Their interse relationship is as under:
3. WP.No.27436/2017 is by Asha Mallikarjuna Hegde (daughter-in-law of Vanaja Ravindra Hegde) and others against Saritha Bhandary (daughter of Manorama Shetty), Sarojini Hegde (wife of Dr.Karunakara Hegde) and Manorama Shetty seeking quashing of order dated 15.07.2011 passed by the Land Tribunal in LRY:7A 1197/2006-07 and or
The court established that claims of occupancy rights under fraudulently presented evidence are invalid, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining authenticity in legal claims regardless of familial r....
The court established that once an application under Form No. 7 is rejected, a subsequent application under Form No. 7A cannot be filed, affirming the civil court's jurisdiction over property dispute....
The Tribunal acted beyond its jurisdiction in granting occupancy rights without notifying interested parties, violating principles of natural justice.
Point of Law : Land Tribunal is bound by the statutory presumption as to entries made in record of rights and order of the Tribunal without any reference to such entries and having no discussion as ....
Land Reforms Act, 1961 is undoubtedly a beneficial legislation. It is important to remember that this piece of legislation is meant to preserve, protect and also confer benefits on persons who are ab....
Revenue records do not confer title; ownership must be established through valid documentation and historical possession.
Importent Point: A certificate issued under Section 72-K of the Act is conclusive. Once the same is found to be conclusive, same can not be refused to be taken into consideration for any purpose wha....
Proper evaluation of documentary evidence is vital in determining occupancy rights; reliance solely on revenue records without considering the broader context can lead to errors in legal judgments.
Jurisdiction of revenue authorities to issue mutation orders upheld when confirmed ownership certificates exist, superseding prior claims based on disputed titles.
Civil Suit - Additional Evidence - Wherever additional evidence is allowed the court shall record reason for its admission.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
