SUBHASH CHAND
Birsa Oraon, S/o Late Charwa Oraon – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Nand Tiwary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH CHAND, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and respondent no.1
In Person.
2. The instant appeal is preferred on behalf of the appellants against impugned Judgment dated 13th December, 2022 and decree dated 3rd January, 2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-V, Ranchi in Original Suit No.372 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has decreed the suit of the plaintiff.
3. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that plaintiff/respondent no.1 Suresh Nand Tiwary had instituted a suit against defendant nos.1 to 11 and against defendant no.12 as a statutory defendant with these averments that he is an original inhabitant of village Pungi, P.O. Karkara, P.S. Mandar, P.S. No.106 District-Ranchi wherein he has also renovated his native house and landed property situated therein, however, due to the professional busy schedule as one of the leading Advocates, the plaintiff mostly resides in his house Sachindanand Bhawan situated at Mohalla Hehal, (Patwatoli) P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District—Ranchi. The plaintiff also owns and possess ancestral, paternal and self-acquired landed property in the village Pungi with a pucca res
Corporation of the City of Bangalore v. M. Papaiah and another (1989) 3 SCC 612 : (AIR 1989 SC 1809)
Guru Amarjit Singh v. Rattan Chand and others (1993) 4 SCC 349
Jattu Ram v. Hakam Singh and Ors. [1993 (4) SCC 403]
Jattu Ram vs Hakam Singh and others reported in AIR 1994 SC 1653
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Keshav Ram and others (1996) 11 SCC 257
State of H.P vs Keshav Ram and others reported in AIR 1997 SC 2181
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.