JUDGMENT :

H.P. Sandesh, J.

This matter is listed for admission. The matter was heard earlier and time was granted and now the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that both the Courts have committed an error in dismissing the suit and also confirming the same.

2. The factual matrix of the case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of permanent injunction, it is specifically pleaded that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of immovable properties measuring east to west 83 feet and north to south 69 feet. The plaintiff had purchased the aforesaid properties under three registered sale deeds from owners thereof, which is dated 16.03.1984 for a valuable consideration. The khata of the said properties are all transferred into the name of the plaintiff firm by the Mysore City Corporation, Mysore. It is the further case of the plaintiff that the suit schedule properties is an old building aged about more than 100 years. Mysore City Corporation, Mysore had issued a notice under Section 322 (1) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act to the plaintiff in the year 1985, calling upon the plaintiff to demolish the schedule properties on the ground that the