Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
S.G.PANDIT, GEETHA K.B.
Srinivas R. S/o Rudrappa – Appellant
Versus
Reshmabanu W/o Hasanapeer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GEETHA K.B., J.
1. These are appeals filed by the owner, claimants and insurer, respectively, under section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, the Act), challenging the judgment and award passed in MVC No.465/2016, dated 14.08.2019, on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Ranebennur (for short, the Tribunal).
2. The owner has challenged the judgment and award insofar as direction issued to insurer to pay the compensation and to recover the same from the owner. The claimants have filed the appeal being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation amount awarded by the tribunal. Insurer has filed the appeal challenging the liability and quantum, contending that the vehicle in question is not involved in the alleged accident.
3. The parties would be referred with their ranks, as they were before the tribunal, for the sake of convenience and clarity.
4. The claimants being the wife, children and mother of deceased have filed the claim petition under section 166 of the Act, contending that husband of claimant No.1, Hasanpeer U.K. S/o.Kasimsab, died in a road traffic accident that occurred on 25.08.2014, involving goods lorry bearing r
The claimants failed to prove the involvement of the Canter lorry in the accident, necessitating dismissal of their claim for compensation.
The insurer cannot evade liability based on a charge-sheet against another vehicle; the Tribunal's findings based on evidence are conclusive.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the tribunal to conduct a proper inquiry, appreciate relevant facts, and follow basic principles of law in determining liability and co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of liability and quantum of compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
The court established that liability for compensation lies primarily with the vehicle owner when an accident occurs outside the permit's authorized area, while allowing the Insurance Company to initi....
The insurance company remains liable for compensation claims even after the death of the insured, as per Section 155 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provided the claim arises from an event covered u....
The court clarifies the burden of proof in accident claims, stating that evidence must meet the standard of preponderance of probability rather than beyond a reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
