SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
UMESH M.ADIGA
Ganesha S/o Narayanappa – Appellant
Versus
Rahamathulla S/o Eqbal Pasha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mohana Chandra P.
For the Respondent: Abubacker Shaji

Table of Content
1. overview of facts and employment relationship (Para 1 , 3)
2. contested employer-employee relationship and legal deficiencies (Para 4 , 10 , 18 , 19 , 20)
3. commissioner's findings on claims and responses (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 14 , 15)
4. final order and dismissal of appeal (Para 8 , 33 , 35)
5. legal implications of section 10 of the ec act (Para 12 , 13 , 17 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

UMESH M. ADIGA, J.

1. This appeal is by the respondent in ECA .No.1/2019 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Hunsur being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 29.11.2021, passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge and Commissioner under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1929 (for short 'Commissioner').

2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Commissioner.

3. The brief facts of the case are that, the appellant (respondent before 'Commissioner') is the owner of a workshop by name 'Ganesha Engineering Works', situated at B.M.bypass road, Hunsur. The petitioner, was an employee of respondent and was working as welder on wages of Rs.400/- per day. The petitioner was discharging his duty as a welder on the instructions and directions of respondent. The respondent h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top