IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bahubali, S/o. Late Nemiraj Gouda Alias Jain – Appellant
Versus
Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies – Respondent
ORDER :
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J.
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, which sets aside the order passed by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 imposing penalty of dismissal from service.
2. Heard the learned counsels Sri.Nagaraj S. Jain and Sri.Ravi Hegde for the petitioner, learned HCGP Smt.Girija S. Hiremath for the respondent-State and the learned counsel Dr.B.B.Ballari for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:
The petitioner is said to have been appointed as a Chief Executive Officer of the 2nd respondent-Vikas Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Bank”, for short). After rendering about 21 years of service, it transpires that the petitioner's services comes to be terminated by the Board of the respondent Bank owing to certain omissions and commissions. The petitioner challenged the said order of termination before the 1st respondent, the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The Joint Register of Co-operative Societies has negated the challenge of the petitioner and rejected the claim. This was challenged by the petitioner before the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. The Karn



A de novo enquiry against a retired employee is impermissible in law unless permitted by service rules, highlighting the protection of employees' rights post-retirement.
If inquiry has been initiated while delinquent employee was in service, it would continue even after his retirement, but nature of punishment would change.
Point of Law : Unless punishment is shockingly/strikingly disproportionate or harsh, in normal circumstances, Court cannot interfere with the same and that too when said order of punishment has been ....
If inquiry has been initiated while delinquent employee was in service, it would continue even after his retirement, but nature of punishment would change.
A de novo inquiry is permissible under Rule 26(1) of the CDA Rules when substantial evidence or procedural defects existed in the prior inquiry, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice....
Rule 7(vii) provides that where charged government servant denies charges, enquiry officer shall proceed to call witnesses proposed in charge sheet.
Employment and Service - Misconduct - Discharge from service - Claiming Retiral Benefits - Society failed to perform its statutory duty by not releasing retiral benefits to appellant.
The court clarified that inquiries against retired government servants can proceed under Rule 214 of KCSR despite Rule 14-A's limitations, affirming the Lokayukta's authority to conduct such inquirie....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, providing adequate opportunity for defense, especially when an employee is facing serious charges and imminent retirement.
The disciplinary authority must provide cogent reasons for ordering a de novo inquiry; failure in this regard vitiates subsequent penalties, while waiver through participation in inquiry bars later c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.