DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Kulamani Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition submitted for specific orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of charges against petitioner. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. counter affidavit filed by respondent. (Para 6) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments against de novo inquiry. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. petitioner's claims about procedural defects. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. inquiry procedures and evidence standards. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. respondent's justification for de novo inquiry. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. role of evidence in inquiry proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 9. disagreement with prior inquiry's findings. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 10. continuation of proceedings post-retirement. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 11. importance of fresh inquiry due to new evidence. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 12. court's observation on inquiry procedures. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 13. discussion on procedural aspects for de novo inquiry. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 14. validation of de novo inquiry decision. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 15. unpacking judgments relevant to inquiry procedures. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 16. distinction of previous judgments outlined. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 17. justification of de novo proceedings discussed. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 18. application of legal principles on examination. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.