SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Kulamani Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition submitted for specific orders. (Para 1)
2. factual background of charges against petitioner. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. counter affidavit filed by respondent. (Para 6)
4. petitioner's arguments against de novo inquiry. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. petitioner's claims about procedural defects. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. inquiry procedures and evidence standards. (Para 13 , 14)
7. respondent's justification for de novo inquiry. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. role of evidence in inquiry proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
9. disagreement with prior inquiry's findings. (Para 21 , 22)
10. continuation of proceedings post-retirement. (Para 23 , 24)
11. importance of fresh inquiry due to new evidence. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
12. court's observation on inquiry procedures. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
13. discussion on procedural aspects for de novo inquiry. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
14. validation of de novo inquiry decision. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)
15. unpacking judgments relevant to inquiry procedures. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
16. distinction of previous judgments outlined. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
17. justification of de novo proceedings discussed. (Para 43 , 44)
18. application of legal principles on examination. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 ,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top