SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2051

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
R. NATARAJ, J.
Sri. Narayanaswamy M S/o. Muniyappa - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 26000 of 2022 (LB-RES)
Decided On : 10-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Narayanaswamy M S/o. Muniyappa
For the Respondent: The State Of Karnataka

Delimitation of wards must consider population density alongside infrastructure and geographical considerations, and courts generally do not intervene in technical matters without substantial evidence.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 243ZG - Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Section 13 - Writ petition challenging the delimitation notification for a Town Panchayat area - Petitioners contended that the delimitation is arbitrary and not based on population density - Respondents argued that the delimitation aligns with the 2011 Census and guidelines issued by the Government - Court found that the delimitation process is technical and requires consideration of various factors, and it concluded that the petitioners lack locus standi to challenge the notification. (Paras 2, 4, 7, 12)

(B) Delimitation of wards - The process must not solely rely on population figures but instead balance population with physical features, communication facilities, and public convenience - The court noted that the petitioners did not provide evidence on how their population could reasonably be assigned to another ward, affirming the necessity of comprehensive analysis in delimitation. (Paras 11, 12)

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek writ for delimitation reconsideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners argue arbitrary ward distribution. (Para 3)
3. respondents support delimitation based on census. (Para 4)
4. guidelines for ward delimitation outlined. (Para 5)
5. map provided showing geographical delimitation. (Para 6)
6. advocate general defends lack of standing. (Para 7 , 8)
7. court finds delimitation exercise technical. (Para 9 , 12)
8. court notes insufficiency of petitioners' arguments. (Para 10 , 11)
9. writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. (Para 13)

ORDER :

R. NATARAJ, J.

The petitioners have sought for a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the notification bearing No.Lo.E E-150 EAP 2022 dated 20.07.2022 in so far as it relates to constituting Bisavanahalli and Kasavanahalli into one ward. They have also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent No.3 to reconsider the delimitation notification based on the density of population in Bashettihalli Pattana Panchyat.

2. (i) The petitioners are permanent residents of Bisuvanahalli and Kasavanahalli which lies within the jurisdiction of Bashettihalli Pattana Panchayat. The respondent No.1 in terms of a notification bearing No.NaAE 09 MLR 2020 dated 24.02.2021 declared Bashettihalli Grama Panchyat as Bashettihalli Pattana Panchayat. Pursuant to the said notification, respondent No.3 issued a draft delimitation notification bearing No.ELN(PAM)CR:16/2020-21 dated 04.05.2022 proposing to delimit the Town Panchyat area into 19 wards on the basis of 2011 census and invited objections from the general public.

(ii) Under the said draft delimitation, Raghunathapura and Thammashettihalli villages were shown as Ward No.1 with a population of 776, Adinarayana Hosahalli, Moparahalli and Nagadenahalli villages were shown as Ward No.2 with a population of 1340, Obadenahalli was shown as Ward No.3 with a population of 566, South-Part of Guddadahalli and East-Part of Guddadahalli shown as Ward No.4 with population of 906, Kolipura village including area from Varadanahalli Muniyappa farm to colony as Ward No.5 with population of 782, Kasavanahalli and Bisuvanahalli were shown as Ward No.6 with population of 1448, Ellupura village (from Anjaneyaswami Temple to South-Part of Railway Gate and West-part of Railway road) was shown as Ward No.7 with population of 1143. Then, Ellupura village (from Anjaneyaswami Temple up to North- portion of Railway Gate and from Anjanenya Swami Temple up to West-portion of Bisuvanahalli village road) was shown as Ward No.8 with population of 856, Varadanahalli (old village) and Ashvathapa layout was shown as Ward No.9 with population of 974. Varadanahalli and Thulisiyan layout was shown as Ward No.10 with population of 1005, Basaveshwara Nagara, Kempegowda Nagara (South Division) and KIADB quarters was shown as Ward No.11 with population of 1144, (Basaveshwara Nagara Ward), Bank Circle, Veerapua Road, 3rd 4th and 5th road of Vijayanagara was shown as Ward No.12 with population of 1034, Vijayanagara 1st road to 3rd road and underneath of Railway Road (including Muneshwara Layout) was shown as Ward No.13 with population of 612, Premkumar House Road, Janatha Colony and Kempegowda Nagara (North Division) was shown as Ward No.14 with population of 879. Hale Uru and Ramachandrappa Layout was shown as Ward No.15 with 897 of population, Ambedkar Nagar, Beside Hale Uru Panchayati, behind Government School and area from Southern side of Krishnappa Layout was shown as Ward No.16 with 1172 population, Kolambiya Layout and Vijayanagara 1st Cross (North Division) was shown as Ward No.17 with population of 839 and Vinayaka Nagara and Krishnappa Layout North area was shown as Ward No.18 with population of 1366. Then (Vinayaka Nagara Ward) and Arehalli Village, Scout Camp Road, Sarvagna Nagara, North-Area of Gurappana Palya and West-area of Guddadahalli was shown as Ward No.19 with population of 974 population (Arehalli Guddadahalli Ward II).

(iii) The petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top