Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Venkatesh S/o Hanumanth Hudedamani – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners in both these petitions are before this Court seeking the following reliefs:
In Writ Petition No.147267/2020:
“a) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the Çadre and Recruitment Rules Of KREIS Rules 2011 vide ANNEXURE-F;
b) Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order direction quashing the final selection list Published by KPSC Udyoga Souda Bengaluru – 01/ Respondent No.2 bearing No. R (2) 712/2020-21/psc dated 9/6/2020 produced at ANNEXURE-H violation as of Article 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and, also as opposed to NCTE regulations;
c) Issue a writ, direction or order including the writ of mandamus, directing the respondents No. 1 to 4 to consider the case of the petitioners for selection and appointment to the post of the Hindi Language Teachers have prescribed qualification, than the respondent no. 5 to 54 whose names have been included in the final select list Published by the KPSC Udyog Souda, Bengaluru - 1 Respondnet 21/psc dated 09.06.2020 produced at ANNEXURE-H and grant them all consequential relief to which they are entitled to meet the ends of justice.
d) Grant
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the process or regulations post-selection, establishing a principle of acquiescence in recruitment law.
The main legal point established is that the selection process must adhere to the criteria specified in the notification, and any deviation without issuing a corrigendum is impermissible.
Candidates on a merit list do not have an indefeasible right to appointment if they fail to meet the prescribed cut-off marks, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes.
The court emphasized the principle of estoppel and upheld the change in policy regarding eligibility criteria and the prerogative of the selection committee to declare the cut off mark in the CBT for....
[Judicial review is concerned with the legality of the decision-making process rather than the merits of the decision itself. The court emphasized the importance of timely challenges to administrativ....
The court upheld the application of the Recruitment Rules, 2025 over previous rules and confirmed judicial deference to executive policy decisions in educational recruitment without breaching rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
