MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Archana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.—Regard being had to the commonality of the controversy in the aforesaid batch of writ petitions, it was thought apposite to hear them analogously, and accordingly, they were heard together with the consent of parties and are being disposed of by the present singular order.
2. The aforesaid writ petitions have been filed for quashing the notice dated 19.09.2023, issued by the In-Charge Secretary of the Bihar Technical Service Commission, Patna (herein after referred to as the ‘Commission’), in connection with Advertisement No. 07 of 2022, whereby and whereunder the process of selection for the purposes of making appointment to the post of Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (herein after referred to as the ‘ANM’) has been amended. The writ petitioners have also prayed for directing the respondent-authorities to conclude the process of selection initiated vide Advertisement No. 07 of 2022 in terms of the provisions contained therein, with respect to the process of selection and other requirements to be fulfilled by the candidates as also in terms of the provisions contained under the Bihar Female Health Workers (Auxiliary Nurse Midwife) Cadre Rules, 2018 (hereinafter referred
Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court
B. N. Nagarajan vs. State of Mysore
Hemani Malhotra vs. High Court of Delhi
N.T. Devin Katti vs. Karnataka Public Service Commission
Mahendran vs. State of Karnataka
Y. V. Rangaiah vs. J. Sreenivasa Rao
K. Manjusree vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohd. Raisul Islam vs. Gokul Mohan Hazarika
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Rajendra Bhimrao Mandve
Hardev Singh vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.