Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
R. NATARAJ
Zakir Ahmed Son Of Mohammed Suleman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and construction details (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. concerns regarding no objection certificate and door number (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of construction legality and authority (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. conditions for continuation of electricity supply and door number allotment (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. final decision on the writ petition (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
R.NATARAJ, J.
The petitioner has challenged an order bearing No.
dated 08.05.2020 passed by respondent No.2, whereby it held that respondent No.4 is entitled to proceed in accordance with law against the construction put up by the petitioner. He has also sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent No. 4 to issue a No Objection Certificate to secure electricity connection to the building in question and to allot a door number to the building constructed by him.
2. (i) The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner of the property bearing Sy.No.129/3D2B (P) measuring 13 cents situate in Bajpe Village, and the property bearing Survey No.145/15A measuring 10 cents situate in Permude Village of Mangaluru Taluk. He contends that he obtained an order from the Mangaluru Urban Development Authority to a
Municipal authorities must issue No Objection Certificates and door numbers in accordance with sanctioned building plans; unauthorized constructions may face enforcement actions.
A Writ of Mandamus may be issued to compel statutory authorities to process applications for permits or certificates like a 'No Objection Certificate' within a reasonable timeframe, provided the peti....
A judicial directive for administrative bodies to hear grievances regarding unauthorized construction within a specified timeframe.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inaction of the respondents in denying a similar treatment to the petitioners as other plot holders who had obtained plots in exchange and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to address unauthorized construction and deviation from approved plans under the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
