Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Anirudh Putsala, S/o. Prasada Rao Putsala – Appellant
Versus
Newspace Research And Technologies Private Limited, Rep. By Its Director Mr. Sameer Joshi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of a writ petition by the petitioner/defendant. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of plaintiff's suit and interlocutory applications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments by the defendants against trial court's order. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. response by the plaintiff countering defendants' claims. (Para 9) |
| 5. court's analysis of jurisdiction issues raised by defendants. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. discussion on judicial discretion and supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. conclusion dismissing the writ petition. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J.
This petition is filed by the petitioner/defendant aggrieved by the impugned order dated 18.8.2025 passed by the trial Court in O.S. No.8367/2024.
2. Parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
3. Plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants seeking the following reliefs:
i) Decree of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, contractors, his employers, partners or any other person/entity claiming through or under the defendants from directly or indirectly copying, sharing or using in any manner the confidential/proprietary information/material belonging to the plaintiff inter alia as referre
Jurisdictional challenges must be addressed promptly, but deferral to await a Commissioner's report is permissible unless it causes manifest injustice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the scope and object of Order 26 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Code, emphasizing its purpose and the need for the Court to ex....
Unconscionable laches can bar relief in petitions under Article 227; courts will not interfere unless there are grave abuses or derelictions.
The failure to record reasons for granting an ex-parte injunction without notice constitutes a jurisdictional error and renders such orders unsustainable.
Point of Law : Petitioners want the Summons issued by the learned Trial Court to be quashed and set aside simply because in their view the Civil Suit is not maintainable and its filing is an abuse of....
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable against non-appealable orders of Commercial Courts despite restrictions in the Commercial Courts Act, preserving the High Cou....
The court ruled that an ex-parte order is interlocutory and barred from revision under the Commercial Courts Act, but the petitioner retains the right to participate in ongoing proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
