SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2472

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
VIBHU BAKHRU, CJ, C.M. POONACHA, J.
Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Luman Industries Limited – Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 308 of 2025
Decided On : 18-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.D. Surana
For the Respondents: Rohan Veeranna Tigadi, Namitha Mahesh B.G.

In procurement matters, minimum eligibility criteria set by State authorities must be reasonable and not arbitrary; courts should exercise restraint in judicial review of such criteria.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Tender Process - Pre-qualification criteria - Minimum turnover criteria of Rs.100 crores found arbitrary in context where contract value was Rs.6.5 crores - Single Judge's order modifying criteria to Rs.6 crores upheld. (Paras 6, 11, 18)

(B) Judicial Restraint - Courts must exercise restraint in matters of procurement by State unless decisions are arbitrary or irrational. (Paras 12-13)

(C) Procurement Criteria - The justification for stipulating turnover requirements emphasized ensuring quality materials from established manufacturers, upheld by the court. (Paras 14-15)

Facts of the case:
Respondent challenged the minimum turnover requirement of Rs.100 crores for bidding on supplies totaling Rs.6.5 crores - The Single Judge modified this to Rs.6 crores.

Findings of Court:
The appeal court restored original turnover criteria, deeming the lower court's ruling unsustainable.

Issues: The primary issue was the reasonableness of the stipulated turnover criteria in the context of the actual procurement need.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court emphasized that courts should not replace procurement criteria set by State entities unless clearly shown to be arbitrary; findings relied on established judicial precedents.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to pre-qualification criteria. (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
2. arguments against minimum turnover criteria. (Para 7 , 9)
3. court's analysis on judicial review scope. (Para 10 , 11)
4. principles of judicial restraint in procurement. (Para 12 , 13)
5. rationale for maintaining turnover criteria. (Para 14 , 15 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

VIBHU BAKHRU, C.J.

1. For the reasons stated in the application – I.A.No.2/2025, the same is allowed. The delay of 139 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. The appellant has filed the present intra-court appeal impugning an order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.12793/2024 (GM-TEN).

3. Respondent No.1 [writ petitioner] had filed the afore- mentioned writ petition, impugning the pre-qualification criteria for submitting bids in terms of the Tender Notification dated 15.03.2024 [hereafter the NIT] issued by the appellant. The respondent’s challenge was not only upheld, but the learned Single Judge also modified the pre-qualification criteria.

4. The appellant [Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation] which is inter alia engaged in providing public transport - had issued the NIT inviting bids for supply of air, oil and fuel filters [the products] required for the vehicles operated by it.

5. The tender conditions as per the NIT, inter alia, stipulated the following pre-qualification criteria:

"1. PRE-QUALIFICATION CRITERIA:

Original Equipment Manufacturers

OR

Suppliers to Original Equipment Manufacturers OR ASRTU RC with OE status

"If any firm is a supplier to Original Equipment Manufacturer/ Firms under RC with OE status for AIR/OIL/ FUEL Filters for TATA, Leyland or Eicher vehicles, their quoted rates will be considered in the respective category of AIR/ OIL/FUEL Filters Irrespective of OE status.

OR

IATF 16949:2016 (or Latest) certified Manufacturers with minimum average annual turnover of Rs.100 Crores for preceding three continuous years (i.e., 2020-21,2021-22 and 2022-23) are eligible to participate.

2. The tenderer should undertake to supply the ordered quantity as per the delivery schedule provided.

3. The tenderer must fulfill all the statutory requirements.

4. Tenderers who have been blacklisted by any of the Government Organization/public supplies undertaking for breach of contract shall not be considered.

5. If the supply and quality performance are not satisfactory in respect of previous supplies, the offer of such firm will be disqualified.

6. Only the Original Equipment Manufacturer or Suppliers to Original Equipment Manufacturers or ASRTU Rate Contract holders with OE STATUS or Manufacturers has to participate in the tender using their own digital signature key. The bid will be rejected, if the Principal Original Equipment Manufacturer or Suppliers to Original Equipment Manufacturers or ASRTU Rate Contract holders with OE STATUS or Manufacturers authorizes someone else to participate/quote the rates on behalf of them.

7. Any bidder from a country which shares a land border with India will be eligible to bid in the tender only if the bidder is registered with the Competent Authority (as detailed at Annexure-B2). In this regard, a compliance certificate/ declaration to be submitted by the bidder on Rs. 20/- & above stamp Paper as per the format at Declaration-III (regarding restrictions on public procurements from bidders of such country/ countries which shares a Land Border with India.)"

6. Respondent No.1 [Luman Industries Limited] which is engaged in the business of manufacturing fuel filters, had filed the aforesaid writ petition aggrieved by the pre-qualification criteria, in as much as, it restricts the participation to only those entities, which had achieved the minimum average annual turnover of Rs.100 crores in the preceding three years [2020-21 to 2022-23]. Since respondent No.1's turnover was less than the said minimum threshold, it was excluded from furnishing its bid pursuant to the tender notification.

7. Respondent No.1 claims that the stip

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top