VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Ursapharm India Private Limited. – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the letter/ order dated 03.08.2021 passed by the respondent authority informing the petitioner of the rejection of its Bid in response to E-Tender Enquiry No. U- 25/12/142C-146C/2019– Med.V for DG ESIC rate Contract No. 142C for supply of Drugs for use of ESI institutions all over the country.
2. The petitioner also seeks a direction to set aside the decision of the respondents contained in their communication dated 06.07.2021, as being non-jurisdictional, predetermined, and arbitrary. Petitioner seeks a further direction to the respondents to issue the Letter of Award to the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid E-Tender Enquiry for supply of drugs for use in ESI Institutions in the country.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is an Indian Company, and is a subsidiary of the German Company, namely, Ursapharm Germany. Petitioner states that Ursapharm Germany is engaged in the manufacture of, inter alia, the drug Povidone: eye lubricant which is “preservative free” and “phospha
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Central Coalfields Limited Vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium)
New Horizons Limited & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.
Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. v. Banbaigon Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. [(1994) 28 DRJ 425]
Montecarlo Limited Vs. NTPC Ltd.
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.