Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, K.RAJASEKAR, JJ
S.Govindaraj – Appellant
Versus
Pramila Nagarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs' claim for partition rights. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendant's denial of plaintiffs' claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. trial court's findings on property rights. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal heirs' entitlement to property. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. confirmation of trial court's judgment. (Para 14) |
The defendant in O.S.No. 3207 of 2022 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil Court at Chennai is the appellant herein, having filed the Appeal questioning the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2023.
2. O.S.No. 3207 of 2022 had been filed by the respondents seeking partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties and to th allocate 3/4 share to them and to declare a settlement deed dated 08.04.2011 registered in the Sub Registrar Office at Velacherry as not binding on them and for permanent injunction and other reliefs.
3. The suit had been filed by three plaintiffs Pramila Narayajan, G.Sharmila and R.Bakyalakshmi / sisters against their brother, S.Govindaraj / the appellant herein. In the plaint, they contended that their grandfather M.C.Vijayaranga Nayakar had purchased the suit schedule property by sale deed dated 23.09.1949. Subsequently, M.C.Vijayaranga Nayakar settled
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
