SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 2931

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Sannabhathappa, Son Of Late Sri Nagappa - Petitioner 
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1), Bengaluru, The Jurisdictional Officer, Under The Income Tax Act 1961 – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 16163 of 2024 (T-IT)
Decided On : 05-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Shreehari Kutsa, Advocate
For the Respondents:Sri. M. Dilip, Advocate

Failure to provide the mandatory seven-day notice period under Section 148A(b) invalidates tax assessments, establishing procedural compliance as crucial in tax law.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148A(b), 148A(d), 147, 144, and 156 - Notice and assessment quashed due to violation of minimum notice period of seven days; all subsequent proceedings deemed invalid as per precedent - Failure to provide requisite time for response constitutes illegality. (Paras 3, 5, 14)

(B) Judicial Guidelines - Mandatory compliance with procedural safeguards is critical to ensure fairness in assessments, as highlighted in established precedents. (Paras 9, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged several notices and assessment orders issued related to the Assessment Year 2015-16, asserting that the notice failed to adhere to the mandatory seven-day notice period stipulated under the Income Tax Act.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the notice's failure to provide the legally required time period rendered it invalid, thereby necessitating the quashing of the subsequent assessment orders and notices.

Issues: Whether the notices issued were valid given the failure to comply with the seven-day notice requirement, and the implications for subsequent assessment actions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the failure to adhere to the minimum notice period rendered the notices and assessments invalid, emphasizing that procedural compliance is essential in tax assessments.

Result: The petition is allowed, and the impugned notices and assessments are quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for writs. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding the validity of notices. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's examination of legal compliance. (Para 5)
4. court's order to quash the impugned notices. (Para 7)

ORDER :

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23/03/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/ 2021-22/1041332854(1) and enclosed as Annexure –B1.

b. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated order u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 04/04/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042494205(1) enclosed as Annexure C.

c. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 04/04/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1042496210(1)and enclosed as Annexure D.

d. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated assessment order under section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1062006966(1) and enclosed as Annexure J1.

e. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice of demand under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015- 16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1062007139(1) and enclosed as Annexure J2.

f. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated computation of income dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/AST/S/114/2023-24/1062007200(1) and enclosed as Annexure J3.

g. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz and ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062007070(1)enclosed as Annexure K1.

h. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz and ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1062007078(1)enclosed as Annexure K2.

i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1062007090(1) and enclosed as Annexure K3.

j. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in this matter including but not limited to COSTS OF THIS PETITION.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invites my attention to the impugned Notice da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top