IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Sannabhathappa, Son Of Late Sri Nagappa - Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1), Bengaluru, The Jurisdictional Officer, Under The Income Tax Act 1961 – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 16163 of 2024 (T-IT)
Decided On : 05-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for writs. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of notices. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's examination of legal compliance. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's order to quash the impugned notices. (Para 7) |
ORDER :
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23/03/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/ 2021-22/1041332854(1) and enclosed as Annexure –B1.
b. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated order u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 04/04/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042494205(1) enclosed as Annexure C.
c. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 04/04/2022 issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1042496210(1)and enclosed as Annexure D.
d. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated assessment order under section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz., ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1062006966(1) and enclosed as Annexure J1.
e. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice of demand under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015- 16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/AST/S/156/2023-24/1062007139(1) and enclosed as Annexure J2.
f. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated computation of income dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/AST/S/114/2023-24/1062007200(1) and enclosed as Annexure J3.
g. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz and ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1062007070(1)enclosed as Annexure K1.
h. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz and ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1062007078(1)enclosed as Annexure K2.
i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other suitable writ for quashing of the digitally signed and electronically communicated notice for penalty under section 274 r.w.s 271F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05/03/2024 issued by the Respondent No. 3 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 which bears the DIN viz ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1062007090(1) and enclosed as Annexure K3.
j. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in this matter including but not limited to COSTS OF THIS PETITION.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner invites my attention to the impugned Notice da
Failure to provide the mandatory seven-day notice period under Section 148A(b) invalidates tax assessments, establishing procedural compliance as crucial in tax law.
Notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation are invalid as per Supreme Court directives.
Notices and orders issued under the Income Tax Act were quashed as time-barred, adhering to Supreme Court mandates on limitation periods.
Notices issued under the Income Tax Act beyond the statutory limitation set by Supreme Court precedents are invalid and must be quashed.
Notices issued beyond the established statutory limitation are invalid and must be quashed, emphasizing compliance with timelines set by legal precedents in tax law.
Notices issued under Section 148A(b) must provide a minimum of seven days for a response; failure to do so renders them invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.