SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Bhulakshmi House Building Co Operative Society – Petitioner 
Versus 
Income Tax Officer – Respondent 
WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2025 (T-IT)
Decided On : 18-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri. Ravi Shankar.S.V, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. M. Thirumalesh, Advocate

Notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation are invalid as per Supreme Court directives.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act - Sections 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), and 271(1)(b) - Assessment year 2013-14 - Notices issued under Section 148 that were beyond the limitation period as determined by the Supreme Court's directives in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal cases deemed invalid - Court emphasized that notices need to be issued within the surviving time limit established by previous judgments. (Paras 4, 6, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging multiple notices and orders regarding tax assessments and penalties for the assessment year 2013-14, all issued under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. Petitioner contended these notices were invalid due to being issued after the prescribed limitation period.

Findings of Court:
The court noted that due to prior directives, the notices were issued beyond the specified time limits, and hence were invalid. All proceedings related to these notices were quashed.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the validity of the notices under Section 148 in light of time limitations set by previous Supreme Court judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that notices issued beyond the limitation date as specified in precedent judgments are invalid. The proceedings were to be quashed accordingly.

Result: Petition is hereby allowed; all impugned notices/orders are quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's sought reliefs in writ (Para 1 , 2)
2. procedural history and case law reference (Para 3)
3. limitations and legal validity of notices (Para 4 , 6)
4. opposing view from respondent on petition merits (Para 5)

ORDER :

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

“i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act, dated 30/06/2021 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033907418(1), Issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A.

ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, dated 24/05/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043131008(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A1.

iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act, dated 27/07/2022, bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044145958(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A2.

iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 28/07/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044240467(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A3.

v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the intimation letter dated 28/07/2022 for notice under Section 148 of the Act bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/91/2022-23/1044243618(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A4.

vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the intimation of procedure under Section 1448 of the Act dated 02/11/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/61/2022-23/1046750133(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A5.

vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed Under section 147 r.w.s 144 dated 29/05/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1053293306(1) Issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A6.

viii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 16/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1057101782(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure- A7.

ix) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 271F of the Act dated 20/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2023-24/1057269217(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A8.

x) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 2718 of the Act dated 31/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/2718/2023-24/1057532807(1), Issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A9.

xi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 15/11/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1057959548(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A10.

xii) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in relation to the assessment year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top