IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
Bhulakshmi House Building Co Operative Society – Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2025 (T-IT)
Decided On : 18-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's sought reliefs in writ (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural history and case law reference (Para 3) |
| 3. limitations and legal validity of notices (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. opposing view from respondent on petition merits (Para 5) |
ORDER :
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J.
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act, dated 30/06/2021 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-22/1033907418(1), Issued by the Respondent No. 1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A.
ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, dated 24/05/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043131008(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A1.
iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act, dated 27/07/2022, bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044145958(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A2.
iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 28/07/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044240467(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A3.
v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the intimation letter dated 28/07/2022 for notice under Section 148 of the Act bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/91/2022-23/1044243618(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A4.
vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the intimation of procedure under Section 1448 of the Act dated 02/11/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/61/2022-23/1046750133(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A5.
vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed Under section 147 r.w.s 144 dated 29/05/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1053293306(1) Issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A6.
viii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 16/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1057101782(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure- A7.
ix) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 271F of the Act dated 20/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2023-24/1057269217(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A8.
x) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 2718 of the Act dated 31/10/2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/2718/2023-24/1057532807(1), Issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure A9.
xi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act dated 15/11/2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(c)/2023-24/1057959548(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2013-14 herein marked as Annexure - A10.
xii) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that in relation to the assessment year

Notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond prescribed limitation are invalid as per Supreme Court directives.
Notices and orders issued under the Income Tax Act were quashed as time-barred, adhering to Supreme Court mandates on limitation periods.
Notices issued beyond the established statutory limitation are invalid and must be quashed, emphasizing compliance with timelines set by legal precedents in tax law.
Notices issued under the Income Tax Act beyond the statutory limitation set by Supreme Court precedents are invalid and must be quashed.
Notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are invalid if they are issued beyond the stipulated 'surviving time' as established by the Apex Court, necessitating adherence to prescribed li....
Notices issued beyond the limitation period established by the Income-tax Act and relevant Supreme Court directives are deemed invalid.
Notices issued under sections 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act beyond the specified limitation period are invalid and subject to quashing.
Notices issued for reassessment under the Income Tax Act must adhere to statutory time limits; those issued beyond the time limit are considered invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.