JUDGMENT - S.M. JHUNJHUNUWALA, J. :---By these petitions, the petitioners seek to challenge the Awards all dated 6th August, 1992 filed in this Court and respectively numbered as 'Award No. 128 of 1992', 'Award No. 129 of 1992' and 'Award No. 130 of 1992'.

2. The 1st petitioner in all these petitions is Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Corporation constituted under the provisions of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short, 'the Municipal Corporation') and the 2nd petitioner is the Municipal Commissioner of Municipal Corporation. The 1st respondent in all these petitions are the Contractors registered with the Municipal Corporation and the 2nd respondent is the Arbitrator who was appointed as the Sole Arbitrator in connection with the disputes which had arisen by and between the Municipal Corporation and the 1st respondents in respect of the work of reconstruction of Barrister Nathpai Marg in cement concrete which was divided into three sections i.e. Part I, Part II and Part III. The 2nd respondent, hereinafter referred to as 'the Arbitrator', after considering the claims raised by the 1st respondents and the Counter-Claim of the Municipal Corporation, made th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document