K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, M.RAMACHANDRAN, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
M. C. Valsala – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
2. We find that what has caused anxiety and even panic is the reluctance to accept the reality and the possible ramifications which such an adjudication might bring in the community texture. Identification of scheduled tribes and scheduled castes in a State or Union Territory is a presidential prerogative as gatherable from Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India. Nobody other than a person who is a member of a caste/tribe can claim to be a scheduled caste or tribe. Therefore claim of a person born of inter - caste marriage that he is a member of one or the other caste requires an adjudication. If he is found as a member of the caste or tribe, he is entitled to be recognised as such. If not, he is disentitled from making a claim. Therefore the issue is whether there is a mechanism for adjudging such
Punit Rai Vs. Dinesh Chaudhury
Sobha Hymayathi Devi Vs. Setti Gangadhara Swamy
Basavalingappa Vs. D. Munichinnappa
Bhaiya Lal Vs. Harkishan Singh
Valsamma Paul Vs. Cochin University
N. E. Horo Vs. Jahanara Jaipal Singh
State of Kerala Vs. Chandramohan
Indra Sawhney. Vs. Union of India
Bijumon Vs. Commissioner for Entrance Examination
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.