SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 635

PRASANNA B.VARALE, S.A.BOBDE
Shri Vivek Brajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Government of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Tushar Mandlekar, P.R. Puri, U.M. Aurangabadkar, S.V. Sohoni, R.P. Joshi with Mrs. M.P. Munshi, M.M. Agnihotri, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mrs. B.
H. Dangre, N.W. Sambre, Addl. Govt. Pleader, D. B. Yengal, D.P. Thakre, T.H. Khan, P.D. Kothari, AGP, Mrs. Kalyani Deshpande, S. V. Manohar, Senior Advocate with G.E. Moharir, K. H. Deshpande, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.E. Moharir, for MSETCL, Mrs. Gauri Vyankatraman, Anoop Parihar, Union of India, S.K. Mishra, Addl. Solicitor General, V.A. Bagaddeo, Advocates. For the Intervener:Tekade h/f A.S. Mardikar, Advocates.

Judgment :-

S.A.BOBDE

1. By these petitions, the petitioners, who are owners and occupiers of land, have in effect challenged the laying of a 400 KV electric transmission line from KoradiII to Wardha (Power Grid). The laying of the electric line involves the construction of towers in the land of the petitioners. Though the challenges are not common to all petitions, the petitioners have questioned the vires of Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Section 10 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. They have also challenged the notification dated 24.08.06 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, empowering the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Transmission Company”) to exercise the powers of a Telegraph Authority for the purpose of laying of an electric lines. The petitioners have also challenged the various orders of the District Magistrate under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 permitting the transmission company to exercise the powers of laying an electric lines after finding that the resistance or obstruction of the petitioners is not justified and further direct





























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top