D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, S.C.GUPTE
Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.
1. Rule. Learned counsel for the Respondents waive service. By consent, the Rule is made returnable forthwith. The writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, by consent and on the request of learned counsel.
2. The petition has been filed in the public interest by a citizen who is a resident of Navi Mumbai. The Petitioner has stated that he has been actively involved in social causes and is also a Vice President in a multi-national company. The grievance of the Petitioner relates to encroachments made on lands belonging to City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), the Fourth Respondent, and Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC), the Third Respondent. The Fifth Respondent is a Minister in the State Government holding the portfolio of Excise and Non-conventional Energy. The Sixth Respondent is a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. The Seventh Respondent is a nephew of the Fifth Respondent and a trustee of the Sixth Respondent.
3. The encroachment in respect of the CIDCO property consists of a bungalow which is described as a glass house. CIDCO has stated in its affidavit-in-reply that the plot
Dipak Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation
Esha Ekta Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Vs. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai
Priyanka Estates International (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Assam
Shanti Sports Club Vs. Union of India
Friends Colony Development Committee
M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. Vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu
Pleasant Stay Hotel Vs. Palani Hills Conservation Council
Virender Gaur Vs. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.