SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1704

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.GUPTE, G.S.KULKARNI
Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Urban Development Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Shekhar Naphade, Milind Sathe, Pravin Samdani, V. Sridharan, F.E. Devitre, Senior Advocates a/w Aniruddha Joshi, Neil Mandevia, Jinal Gogri, Pratiti Naphade, Prateek Seksaria, Tushar Ingale i/by Nivit Srivastava, Rajiv Narula i/by Jhangiani Narula & Associates & i/by A.G. Revankar & Company, a/w Nishad Bhatia i/by Cr.Bayley & Company, R.D. Soni, H.N. Vakil, Gajendra Jain i/by Mulla & Mulla, Dr. Birendra Saraf, Ms. Hemlata Jain, Amey Nabar, Jahaan Dastur i/by Hariani & Company, R.H. Daulat, C.K. Sancheti, S.V. Doijode i/by Doijode & Associates, S.R. Ganbavale, Harshad Palwe, Tanmayi Gadre Rajyadhyaksha i/by G.M. Savgave, K.S. Dewal, Susheel Mahadeshwar, Ranjana Todankar, Prerna Janvekar, S.G. Karandikar, V.A. Gangal, Arup Deshmukh, Rohidas Gawade i/by Punit B. Anand, Amit Borkar, Gauri Godse, R.D. Soni i/by Ram & Company, Advocates.
For the Respondents:D.J. Khambata, Advocate General, P.K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate a/w Nitin Deshpande, AGP, Afroz Khan, Gauri Raghuvanshi, R3, R7 D.A. Nalawade, R5, R1, R2, N.R. Bubna, Pooja Singh, R6, R4, Mandar Limaye, Jaydeep Deo, Advocates.

Judgment :

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. The Honourable the Chief Justice has constituted this Full Bench in order to resolve a conflict between the conflicting views which have been expressed by two Division Benches of this Court. In our detailed order dated 24th April, 2014 we noticed that conflict and by consent of parties we formulated the questions which have to be answered by us. They read as under :-

(1) Does Section 3(1)(b) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 read with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 r/w Section 7 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 save the orders of exemption including all terms and conditions thereof passed under Section 20(1) of the Principal Act, namely, the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and all actions taken there-under?

(2) Whether, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 r/w Section 7 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 apply to the repeal of the Principal Act by the Repealing Act, 1999?

(3) Whether in view of Section 3(1)(b) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 and the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 :

(a) the order of exemption including all its terms and conditions und


































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top