R.D.DHANUKA
Mukesh Nanji Gala – Appellant
Versus
Heritage Enterprises – Respondent
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) the petitioners have prayed for leave to file this petition for raising their objections to the impugned award dated 19th March, 2013 and have prayed that the said award be quashed and set aside. The learned arbitrator is impleaded as respondent no. 2. The petitioner has also prayed that this court shall direct the learned arbitrator to deposit in this court all the records, paper and proceedings of the arbitration between the respondent no. 1 (original claimant) and the society i.e. Apsara Coop. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. By the impugned award the learned arbitrator had declared that the MOU dated 30th April, 2008 executed between M/s. Heritage Enterprises (original claimant in arbitration proceedings and respondent no. 1 herein) and Apsara Coop. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. is valid subsisting, enforceable and binding upon those parties and that the claimant is entitled to specific performance thereof.
2. At the threshold Mr. Samdani learned senior counsel for the respondent no. 1 raises a preliminary objection to the maintainability of this petition.
T.K. Lathika vs. Seth Karsandas Jamnadas
Firm Ashok Traders vs. Gurmukhdas Saluja and Others
State of Maharashtra & Others vs. Ark Builders Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2011 SC 1374
Union of India vs. Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors
Benarsi Krishna Committee & Others vs. Karmyogi Shelters Pvt. Ltd. (2012) 9 SCC 496
S.N. Prasad vs. Monnet Finance Ltd. and Others
Daman Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab
State of U.P. vs. Chheoki Employees Cooperative Society Ltd. AIR 1997 SC 1413
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.