SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANJULA CHELLUR, M.S. SONAK, JJ.
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority - Petitioner
Versus
The Fare Fixation Committee and Ors. - Respondents
WRIT PETITION NO. 2605 OF 2015
Decided On : 04-12-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Dr. Birendra Saraf, Mr. Ayush Agarwala, Ms. Akriti Sarkar, Mr. C. Nageshwaran, Aditya Thakkar, Khaitan & Co.
For the State : Mr. Dushyant Kumar
For the Union of India : Mr. Vijay Kantharia, Mr. D.P. Singh, Mr. Anil Yadav
For the Respondent: Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Mr. Chirag Kamdar, Mr. D.J. Kikalia, Tushaar Kikalia, M/s. Mulla & Mulla

JUDGMENT :

MANJULA CHELLUR, J.

1. The present petition is filed challenging the recommendations and the decision made by the Fare Fixation Committee (hereinafter referred to as 'FFC') for increase in the Mumbai Metro Fare from Rs.9 – Rs.13 in the year 2014-15 which came to be increased to Rs.10 – Rs.110 from January 2015.

2. The petitioner before us is Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'MMRDA'). It is an authority established under Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 which is mainly concerned with the Planning, Co-ordination and Supervision of proper, orderly and rapid development of areas in the Metropolitan Region of Mumbai. It is also under an obligation to execute the plans, projects and schemes for such development as well as matter connected therewith. The petitioner – MMRDA is also the authority for implementing Metro project i.e. Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar Corridor Mass Rapid Transit System (Metro project). This came to be planned by the State Government in order to absolve chaotic conditions faced by users of public transport i.e. BEST buses and local trains.

3. The respondent no.1 is the Fare Fixation Committee constituted by second respondent – Union of India in terms of Section 34 of the Metro Railway (Operation and Maintenance) Act of 2002 {for short known as 'Metro Act'}. The first respondent was constituted by an order dated 7th April 2015 to determine the fares for Metro project. Respondent no.3 is the State of Maharashtra which has constituted/designated the petitioner as Project Implementation Agency for Metro project. Respondent no.4 - Mumbai Metro One Pvt. Ltd (for short known as MMOPL) is a private company jointly incorporated by M/s. Reliance Ltd, Veolia Transport S.A. and the MMRDA and are holding 69%, 5% and 26% shareholding respectively. The MMOPL is a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to undertake the business of designing, building, operating and maintaining the Metro project on Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) basis, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Concession Agreement which came to be entered into between MMRDA and MMOPL.

4. It is not in dispute that MMRDA as Implementing Agency for Metro project came out with a Detailed Project Report (DPR) providing for actual commencement of operations in 2011, and stipulated that the Metro fares should be fixed at 1.5 times the ordinary (Non Air-conditioned) BEST bus fares. This corresponds to fare ranging between Rs.6 to 10 in 2011 to be revised by 11% every four years. The DPR also estimated Ridership figures ranging from 5.66 lakhs per day in 2011 to 12.06 lakhs passengers per day in 2041. An international competitive bidding/global tenders came to be invited by the MMRDA on 21st August 2004 by a notice. This was an invitation for proposal of Metro Project on BOOT basis subject to terms and conditions specified in the request for proposals. The project was to be implemented on Private/Public Partnership (PPP) basis. Some of the salient features in the proposals were mentioned as under :

(a) The Concession Agreement was to be for 35 years, including the construction period of five years.

(b) The Metro was to operate on an East-West corridor of 11.50 kms along 12 stations.

(c) The estimated Ridership was 5.66 lakhs per day opening at the beginning in the year 2011 and this was to enhance upto 12.06 lakhs per day at the end of 30 years term in 2041 from 2011.

(d) The Bidders were, however, required to make their own estimates of Ridership, financial and other details.

(e) The initial fare was fixed between Rs.6 – 8 – 10 for the year 2003-04 and was subject to upward revision by 11% at every four years.

(f) Each of the bidder was required to submit a Detail Business Plan indicating arrangement of finances, operation and maintenance plan, sources and usage of the funds, projected an


































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

gpt-4

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top