ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Rajendra Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Sharda Ratnam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anuja Prabhudessai, J.
By this Notice of Motion, the Plaintiffs herein have sought following reliefs:-
(i) To give notice to the defendant No.1 to remove her belongings from the suit premises
(ii) Failing which, court receiver may remove belongings of the defendant from the suit flat.
(iii) Take physical possession of the suit flat from the defendant by breaking upon the lock of the suit flat, if necessary, by taking police help.
(iv) Hand over quite, vacant and peaceful possession of the suit flat to the plaintiff as agents of the court receiver without payment of any compensation of security.
(v) The Defendant No.2 be ordered and directed to hand over the original title deeds with respect to the suit flat to the plaintiffs, for the purpose of perfecting the title of the suit flat.
(vi) The Defendant No.2 be restrained from causing any obstruction while handing over the possession of the flat to the plaintiffs, while taking possession as agents of Court Receiver.
(b) Ad interim reliefs in terms of prayer (a) be granted.
(c) Cost of the notice of motion be provided for."
2. The dispute in the present case is
Jehal Tanti Vs. Nageshwar Singh
Lourdy MAri David and Ors. vs. Louis Chinnaya Arogiaswamy and Ors.1996 AIR(SC) 2814
Purshottam Vishindas Raheja vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors.1982 AIR(Bom) 523
Ram Avadh vs. Achhaibar Dubey and Anr.2000 AIR(SC) 860
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by L.R.s Vs. Jagannath (dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.1994 AIR(SC) 853
Tayabhai M. Bagasarwalla vs. Hind Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Vindur Impex and Traders Private Limited and Ors. vs. Tosh Apartments Private Limited and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.