IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
R.D. Dhanuka, Madhav Jamdar, JJ.
K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J V - Appellant
Versus
Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council Office At Council Office, Ichalkaranji Dist Kolhapur - Respondent
Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 4077 of 2020, 4096 of 2020; Interim Application No. 1 of 2020
Decided On : 27-10-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request to quash council actions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of contract and its extensions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. arguments on procedural compliance. (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. legal observations on powers of the collector. (Para 25 , 30 , 32 , 37 , 39) |
| 5. final ruling on the case. (Para 54 , 57) |
JUDGMENT
R.D. Dhanuka, J. - By Writ Petition (St.) No.4077 of 2020 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for Writ of Certiorari for setting aside the impugned order dated 26th February 2020 passed by the Chief Officer, Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council cancelling, revoking and concluding the contract with the petitioner and seeks an order and direction against the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 4th February 2020 and to allow the petitioner to complete the project. The petitioner has also impugned the Resolution No.252 dated 28th February 2020 passed by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council and prays for quashing and setting aside the impugned Communication dated 9th March 2020 issued by the Chief Officer, Ichalkarnajee Municipal Council in furtherance of the Resolution dated 28th February 2020.
2. By Writ Petition (St.) No.4096 of 2020, the petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the order dated 10th February 2020 passed by the District Collector, Kolhapur under Section 308 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act) thereby ordering to suspend the Resolution dated 31st December 2019 passed by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council granting extension to the contract awarded to the petitioner till 30th June 2020. Interim Application No.1 of 2020 is filed by Mr.Prakash Maruti Morbale in Writ Petition (St.) No.4096 of 2020 inter alia praying for impleadment of the applicant as one of the respondents. By consent of parties, both these petitions and also the interim application were heard together finally and are being disposed of by a common order. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding the aforesaid writ petitions and the interim application are as under :-
3. Some time in the year 2014, Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as "Municipal Council") invited tender for the Development of Underground Sewerage Scheme in Ichalkaranji City which included designing, providing sewere network, constructing, erecting and commissioning of intermediate Sewage Pumping Stations, raising main, 10 + 8 MLD capacity Sewage Treatment Plants based on advanced technology under Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small and Medium Towns (hereinafter referred to as "the said work").
4. Pursuant to the said invitation, Joint Venture of Khillare Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Vistacore Infra Projects known as K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V. submitted their bid for the said work. On 25th August 2014, an agreement was entered into between the petitioner J.V. and the said Municipal Council thereby awarding the said contract to the said J.V. On 28th August 2014, the said Municipal Council issued a work order in favour of the said J.V. The stipulated period of completion of the said work according to the said work was 24 months i.e. till 27th August 2016. On 9th August 2016, the Municipal Council extended the original period by 18 months i.e. till 27th February 2018. It is the case of the Municipal Council that the petitioner failed to complete the work even within the extended period. The said Municipal Council granted further extension for completion of the work upto 4th February 2019 however by imposing penalty of Rs.5,100/- per day on the petitioner till completion of the said work. It is the case of the Municipal Council that the petitioner had challenged levy of penalty before the learned Collector, Kolhapur but was unsuccessful.
5. On the other hand, it is the case of the petitio
Al-Waffi Agro Food Company, Balapur, Dist. Akola v/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
B.L. Sreedhar and Ors. v/s. K.M. Munireddy (dead) and Ors.
Deewan Singh and Ors. v/s. Rajendra Pd. Ardevi and Ors.
Dinkar Anna Patil and Anr. v/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Gammon India Limited v/s. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai
Joshi Technologies International Inc. v/s. Union of India and Ors.
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
P. Dasa Muni Reddy v/s. P. Appa Rao
P. T. Rajan vs. T.P.M. Sahir & Ors.
Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. vs. Gayatri Construction Company & Anr.
Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. v/s. Kausarbag Cooperative Housing Society Limited and Anr.
Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. vs. Jain Studios Ltd.
State of Kerala & Ors. vs. M. K. Jose
State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. v/s. M/s G.S. Dall and Flour Mills
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.