SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Bom) 1286

UJJAL BHUYAN
Devkumar Gopaldas Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Board of Trustees of The Port of Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Viren Asar, Farid Karachiwala, Sneh Parikh, Mahek Chheda, Ahura Postwala i/by J. Sagar Associates, Shweta Shah, Jyoti Arora, Gaurav Gopal, Vyomi Chande i/by Wadia Ghandy and Company, Daraius Khambata, Senior Advocate i/b Dalal & Co., Shyam Mehta, Senior Advocate, Rupesh Geek, Sweta Shah and Shantanu Asar i/by Parinam Law Associates
For the Respondent:Shrihari Aney, Narendra Walawalka, Senior Advocates, Roopadaksha Basu, Harsha Asnani, i/by The Law Point, Soheb Sheikh i/by Desai Carrimjee and Mulla, K.H. Halai, Pratyush Ranjan and Yash Jain i/by Halai and Co.

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

1. This order will dispose of all the above noted writ petitions.

2. Heard Mr. Daraius Khambata and Mr. Shyam Mehta, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Viren Asar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shrihari Aney and Mr. Narendra Walawalkar, learned senior counsel along with Mr. R. Basu and Mr. H. Asnani, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in all the cases; Mr. K.H. Halai, learned counsel has appeared for respondent No. 3 in Writ Petition No. 482 of 2019; and Mr. Soheb Sheikh, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 in Writ Petition No. 482 of 2019.

3. Writ Petition No. 482 of 2019 was argued by learned counsel for the parties as the lead case and any decision rendered therein will cover all the remaining 20 writ petitions. Therefore, Writ Petition No. 482 of 2019 is taken up as the lead case and the factual narratives and submissions would be in the context of the said writ petition.

4. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek quashing of order dated 15.02.2018 passed by respondent No. 2 in Case No. EO/E(63)(63-A) of 2001, rather quashing of all the orders passed by respondent No. 2 in the said

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top